LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Consequences of the implementation of the Loading Ledge - A descriptive case study at IKEA
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2004
- Author/s
- Jonsson, André; Mathiasen, Björn
- Department/s
- Packaging Logistics
- In LUP since
- 2008-05-15
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 4294 | 44 | 0 |
Ireland  |
596 (14%) |
United States of America  |
474 (11%) |
China  |
305 (7%) |
Germany  |
287 (7%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
261 (6%) |
Malaysia  |
255 (6%) |
Sweden  |
192 (4%) |
Australia  |
156 (4%) |
France  |
125 (3%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
121 (3%) |
Singapore  |
120 (3%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
110 (3%) |
India  |
88 (2%) |
Viet Nam  |
73 (2%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
66 (2%) |
Thailand  |
42 (1%) |
Canada  |
42 (1%) |
Kenya  |
42 (1%) |
Unknown  |
40 (1%) |
South Korea  |
39 (1%) |
Spain  |
39 (1%) |
Finland  |
38 (1%) |
Denmark  |
35 (1%) |
Indonesia  |
34 (1%) |
Poland  |
32 (1%) |
Pakistan  |
30 (1%) |
Japan  |
29 (1%) |
Russian Federation  |
29 (1%) |
Romania  |
27 (1%) |
Greece  |
26 (1%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
25 (1%) |
Italy  |
22 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
21 (0%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
21 (0%) |
Ukraine  |
21 (0%) |
Egypt  |
21 (0%) |
Portugal  |
18 (0%) |
Czechia  |
16 (0%) |
Bangladesh  |
16 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
15 (0%) |
Switzerland  |
14 (0%) |
Philippines  |
14 (0%) |
Ghana  |
14 (0%) |
Norway  |
14 (0%) |
Albania  |
13 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
13 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
13 (0%) |
Austria  |
12 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
11 (0%) |
South Africa  |
11 (0%) |
European Union location  |
10 (0%) |
Belgium  |
9 (0%) |
Iran  |
9 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
8 (0%) |
Sudan  |
6 (0%) |
Ethiopia  |
6 (0%) |
Latvia  |
6 (0%) |
Serbia  |
6 (0%) |
Zambia  |
6 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
6 (0%) |
Maldives  |
5 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
5 (0%) |
Qatar  |
5 (0%) |
Brazil  |
5 (0%) |
Nigeria  |
5 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
4 (0%) |
Peru  |
4 (0%) |
Hungary  |
4 (0%) |
Israel  |
4 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
4 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
4 (0%) |
Myanmar  |
4 (0%) |
Morocco  |
3 (0%) |
Oman  |
3 (0%) |
Iraq  |
3 (0%) |
Colombia  |
3 (0%) |
Jordan  |
3 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
3 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
3 (0%) |
Cameroon  |
3 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
3 (0%) |
Croatia  |
3 (0%) |
Mexico  |
3 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
3 (0%) |
Asia-Pacific location  |
3 (0%) |
Yemen  |
2 (0%) |
Algeria  |
2 (0%) |
Mauritius  |
2 (0%) |
Zimbabwe  |
2 (0%) |
Macao  |
2 (0%) |
Montenegro  |
2 (0%) |
Belarus  |
2 (0%) |
Chile  |
2 (0%) |
Guyana  |
2 (0%) |
Uganda  |
2 (0%) |
Puerto Rico  |
1 (0%) |
El Salvador  |
1 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
1 (0%) |
Malawi  |
1 (0%) |
Gibraltar  |
1 (0%) |
Somalia  |
1 (0%) |
Eswatini  |
1 (0%) |
Fiji  |
1 (0%) |
Unknown (Anonymous Proxy)  |
1 (0%) |
Argentina  |
1 (0%) |
Mozambique  |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
1 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
1 (0%) |
Cambodia  |
1 (0%) |
Antigua and Barbuda  |
1 (0%) |
Nepal  |
1 (0%) |
Suriname  |
1 (0%) |
Lesotho  |
1 (0%) |
Montserrat  |
1 (0%) |
Bahamas  |
1 (0%) |
Turkmenistan  |
1 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam  |
1 (0%) |
Namibia  |
1 (0%) |
Ecuador  |
1 (0%) |
Iceland  |
1 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
1 (0%) |
Cyprus  |
1 (0%) |