LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Analysis of the rainfall-runoff pattern of a catchment with limited data to estimate the runoff potential. Case study: The Mefou sub basin in Cameroon
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2008
- Author/s
- Bakoh, Sylvester Kebila
- Department/s
- Division of Water Resources Engineering
- In LUP since
- 2008-01-27
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 6484 | 90 | 2 |
India  |
1034 (16%) |
Sudan  |
673 (10%) |
United States of America  |
410 (6%) |
Ethiopia  |
392 (6%) |
South Africa  |
249 (4%) |
Nigeria  |
240 (4%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
225 (3%) |
Malaysia  |
225 (3%) |
Philippines  |
220 (3%) |
Cameroon  |
207 (3%) |
Sweden  |
154 (2%) |
Kenya  |
131 (2%) |
Germany  |
110 (2%) |
Pakistan  |
101 (2%) |
Indonesia  |
83 (1%) |
Zimbabwe  |
73 (1%) |
Unknown  |
72 (1%) |
China  |
66 (1%) |
Iran  |
66 (1%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
64 (1%) |
Australia  |
63 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
63 (1%) |
Canada  |
62 (1%) |
Thailand  |
61 (1%) |
Sri Lanka  |
57 (1%) |
Japan  |
54 (1%) |
European Union location  |
53 (1%) |
France  |
51 (1%) |
Russian Federation  |
43 (1%) |
Bangladesh  |
43 (1%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
39 (1%) |
Nepal  |
39 (1%) |
Italy  |
39 (1%) |
Uganda  |
35 (1%) |
South Korea  |
35 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
34 (1%) |
Egypt  |
33 (1%) |
Belgium  |
29 (0%) |
Iraq  |
28 (0%) |
Czechia  |
27 (0%) |
Ghana  |
26 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
26 (0%) |
Switzerland  |
26 (0%) |
Norway  |
25 (0%) |
Mexico  |
20 (0%) |
Brazil  |
20 (0%) |
Jordan  |
20 (0%) |
Finland  |
19 (0%) |
Myanmar  |
19 (0%) |
Algeria  |
18 (0%) |
Singapore  |
18 (0%) |
Spain  |
17 (0%) |
Viet Nam  |
17 (0%) |
Poland  |
17 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
16 (0%) |
Mauritius  |
15 (0%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
14 (0%) |
Ukraine  |
14 (0%) |
Malawi  |
14 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic  |
13 (0%) |
Namibia  |
13 (0%) |
Denmark  |
13 (0%) |
Oman  |
12 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory  |
11 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
11 (0%) |
Cambodia  |
11 (0%) |
Afghanistan  |
11 (0%) |
Ireland  |
11 (0%) |
Somalia  |
10 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
10 (0%) |
Serbia  |
10 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
10 (0%) |
Bhutan  |
9 (0%) |
Greece  |
9 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
8 (0%) |
Papua New Guinea  |
8 (0%) |
Latvia  |
8 (0%) |
Benin  |
8 (0%) |
Eritrea  |
8 (0%) |
Romania  |
8 (0%) |
Colombia  |
8 (0%) |
Peru  |
8 (0%) |
Zambia  |
7 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
7 (0%) |
Morocco  |
7 (0%) |
Libya  |
6 (0%) |
Unknown (Satellite Provider)  |
6 (0%) |
Samoa  |
6 (0%) |
Chile  |
6 (0%) |
Portugal  |
6 (0%) |
Albania  |
6 (0%) |
Lesotho  |
6 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
6 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
6 (0%) |
Georgia  |
5 (0%) |
Yemen  |
5 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
5 (0%) |
Israel  |
5 (0%) |
Fiji  |
5 (0%) |
Eswatini  |
4 (0%) |
Croatia  |
4 (0%) |
Bolivia  |
4 (0%) |
Botswana  |
4 (0%) |
Azerbaijan  |
4 (0%) |
Austria  |
4 (0%) |
El Salvador  |
3 (0%) |
Guyana  |
3 (0%) |
Argentina  |
3 (0%) |
Madagascar  |
3 (0%) |
Mali  |
3 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
3 (0%) |
Burkina Faso  |
3 (0%) |
Unknown (Anonymous Proxy)  |
2 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
2 (0%) |
Tajikistan  |
2 (0%) |
Qatar  |
2 (0%) |
Hungary  |
2 (0%) |
Mongolia  |
2 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
2 (0%) |
Nicaragua  |
2 (0%) |
Iceland  |
2 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
2 (0%) |
Congo  |
2 (0%) |
Djibouti  |
2 (0%) |
Estonia  |
2 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
2 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
2 (0%) |
Uruguay  |
2 (0%) |
Malta  |
2 (0%) |
Panama  |
2 (0%) |
Cyprus  |
2 (0%) |
Mozambique  |
2 (0%) |
Puerto Rico  |
1 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
1 (0%) |
Venezuela  |
1 (0%) |
Honduras  |
1 (0%) |
Seychelles  |
1 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
1 (0%) |
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines  |
1 (0%) |
Costa Rica  |
1 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
1 (0%) |
Saint Kitts and Nevis  |
1 (0%) |
Ecuador  |
1 (0%) |
New Caledonia  |
1 (0%) |
Niger  |
1 (0%) |
Suriname  |
1 (0%) |
Saint Pierre and Miquelon  |
1 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam  |
1 (0%) |
Uzbekistan  |
1 (0%) |