LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Analysis of the rainfall-runoff pattern of a catchment with limited data to estimate the runoff potential. Case study: The Mefou sub basin in Cameroon
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2008
- Author/s
- Bakoh, Sylvester Kebila
- Department/s
- Division of Water Resources Engineering
- In LUP since
- 2008-01-27
Downloads
Total | This Year | This Month |
6371 | 114 | 4 |
India | 1024 (16%) |
Sudan | 673 (11%) |
Ethiopia | 392 (6%) |
United States of America | 384 (6%) |
South Africa | 248 (4%) |
Nigeria | 236 (4%) |
Malaysia | 225 (4%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 225 (4%) |
Philippines | 220 (3%) |
Cameroon | 203 (3%) |
Sweden | 151 (2%) |
Kenya | 131 (2%) |
Germany | 108 (2%) |
Pakistan | 101 (2%) |
Indonesia | 82 (1%) |
Unknown | 72 (1%) |
Zimbabwe | 71 (1%) |
Iran | 66 (1%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | 64 (1%) |
China | 64 (1%) |
Australia | 63 (1%) |
Canada | 62 (1%) |
Turkiye | 61 (1%) |
Thailand | 61 (1%) |
Sri Lanka | 57 (1%) |
Japan | 53 (1%) |
European Union location | 53 (1%) |
France | 50 (1%) |
Bangladesh | 43 (1%) |
Russian Federation | 40 (1%) |
Italy | 39 (1%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of | 39 (1%) |
Nepal | 38 (1%) |
Uganda | 35 (1%) |
South Korea | 34 (1%) |
Egypt | 32 (1%) |
Belgium | 28 (0%) |
Iraq | 28 (0%) |
Hong Kong (China) | 28 (0%) |
Czechia | 27 (0%) |
Switzerland | 26 (0%) |
Ghana | 25 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia | 25 (0%) |
Norway | 24 (0%) |
Jordan | 20 (0%) |
Mexico | 19 (0%) |
Finland | 19 (0%) |
Myanmar | 19 (0%) |
Algeria | 18 (0%) |
Brazil | 16 (0%) |
Rwanda | 16 (0%) |
Poland | 16 (0%) |
Mauritius | 15 (0%) |
Spain | 15 (0%) |
Viet Nam | 15 (0%) |
Ukraine | 14 (0%) |
Taiwan (China) | 14 (0%) |
Malawi | 14 (0%) |
Singapore | 14 (0%) |
Namibia | 13 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic | 12 (0%) |
Denmark | 12 (0%) |
Ireland | 11 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic | 11 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory | 11 (0%) |
Afghanistan | 11 (0%) |
Oman | 11 (0%) |
Cambodia | 11 (0%) |
Sierra Leone | 10 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates | 9 (0%) |
Greece | 9 (0%) |
Bhutan | 9 (0%) |
Somalia | 9 (0%) |
Serbia | 9 (0%) |
Peru | 8 (0%) |
Papua New Guinea | 8 (0%) |
Benin | 8 (0%) |
Romania | 8 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago | 8 (0%) |
Colombia | 8 (0%) |
Latvia | 8 (0%) |
Lithuania | 7 (0%) |
Morocco | 7 (0%) |
Zambia | 7 (0%) |
New Zealand | 6 (0%) |
Portugal | 6 (0%) |
Unknown (Satellite Provider) | 6 (0%) |
Chile | 6 (0%) |
Lesotho | 6 (0%) |
Samoa | 6 (0%) |
Libya | 6 (0%) |
Eritrea | 6 (0%) |
Albania | 6 (0%) |
Fiji | 5 (0%) |
Tunisia | 5 (0%) |
Georgia | 5 (0%) |
Yemen | 5 (0%) |
Bulgaria | 5 (0%) |
Austria | 4 (0%) |
Botswana | 4 (0%) |
Eswatini | 4 (0%) |
Bolivia | 4 (0%) |
Israel | 4 (0%) |
Guyana | 3 (0%) |
Mali | 3 (0%) |
El Salvador | 3 (0%) |
Lebanon | 3 (0%) |
Argentina | 3 (0%) |
Azerbaijan | 3 (0%) |
Madagascar | 3 (0%) |
Burkina Faso | 3 (0%) |
Croatia | 3 (0%) |
Congo | 2 (0%) |
Cyprus | 2 (0%) |
Tajikistan | 2 (0%) |
Estonia | 2 (0%) |
Uruguay | 2 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of | 2 (0%) |
Iceland | 2 (0%) |
Hungary | 2 (0%) |
Nicaragua | 2 (0%) |
Djibouti | 2 (0%) |
Panama | 2 (0%) |
Malta | 2 (0%) |
Unknown (Anonymous Proxy) | 2 (0%) |
Kuwait | 2 (0%) |
Mongolia | 2 (0%) |
Kazakhstan | 2 (0%) |
Luxembourg | 2 (0%) |
Slovenia | 2 (0%) |
Qatar | 2 (0%) |
Bahrain | 1 (0%) |
Costa Rica | 1 (0%) |
Suriname | 1 (0%) |
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | 1 (0%) |
Saint Pierre and Miquelon | 1 (0%) |
Honduras | 1 (0%) |
Mozambique | 1 (0%) |
Saint Kitts and Nevis | 1 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 (0%) |
Slovakia | 1 (0%) |
Ecuador | 1 (0%) |
Uzbekistan | 1 (0%) |
Niger | 1 (0%) |
Puerto Rico | 1 (0%) |
New Caledonia | 1 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam | 1 (0%) |
Seychelles | 1 (0%) |