LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Success factors for a tourism ecolabel The capabilities of tourism stakeholders in Belarus in facilitating the success of an ecolabelling initiative
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2005
- Author/s
- Filimonau, Viachaslau
- Department/s
- The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics
- In LUP since
- 2007-11-01
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 1299 | 22 | 2 |
United States of America  |
151 (12%) |
Germany  |
105 (8%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
74 (6%) |
Sweden  |
70 (5%) |
France  |
51 (4%) |
China  |
45 (3%) |
Philippines  |
38 (3%) |
Italy  |
34 (3%) |
India  |
33 (3%) |
Spain  |
32 (2%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
30 (2%) |
Singapore  |
24 (2%) |
Turkiye  |
22 (2%) |
Australia  |
21 (2%) |
Russian Federation  |
20 (2%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
20 (2%) |
Ukraine  |
18 (1%) |
Czechia  |
17 (1%) |
Ireland  |
17 (1%) |
Kenya  |
17 (1%) |
Canada  |
16 (1%) |
Portugal  |
16 (1%) |
Indonesia  |
16 (1%) |
Belarus  |
15 (1%) |
Austria  |
15 (1%) |
Egypt  |
14 (1%) |
Viet Nam  |
14 (1%) |
Switzerland  |
14 (1%) |
Jamaica  |
14 (1%) |
Romania  |
13 (1%) |
Finland  |
13 (1%) |
Fiji  |
13 (1%) |
Guyana  |
13 (1%) |
Poland  |
12 (1%) |
Denmark  |
11 (1%) |
Unknown  |
11 (1%) |
Greece  |
11 (1%) |
European Union location  |
11 (1%) |
South Africa  |
10 (1%) |
Thailand  |
9 (1%) |
Nepal  |
9 (1%) |
Malaysia  |
9 (1%) |
Belgium  |
8 (1%) |
Cyprus  |
7 (1%) |
Slovenia  |
7 (1%) |
Mauritius  |
7 (1%) |
Lithuania  |
7 (1%) |
Brazil  |
7 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
7 (1%) |
Nigeria  |
6 (0%) |
Iran  |
6 (0%) |
Croatia  |
5 (0%) |
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)  |
5 (0%) |
Jordan  |
5 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
4 (0%) |
Zimbabwe  |
4 (0%) |
Barbados  |
4 (0%) |
Georgia  |
4 (0%) |
Hungary  |
4 (0%) |
South Korea  |
4 (0%) |
Morocco  |
4 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
3 (0%) |
Albania  |
3 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
3 (0%) |
Mexico  |
3 (0%) |
Unknown (Satellite Provider)  |
3 (0%) |
Argentina  |
3 (0%) |
Iceland  |
3 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
3 (0%) |
Armenia  |
2 (0%) |
Uganda  |
2 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
2 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
2 (0%) |
Ethiopia  |
2 (0%) |
Latvia  |
2 (0%) |
Chile  |
2 (0%) |
Malta  |
2 (0%) |
Algeria  |
2 (0%) |
Montenegro  |
2 (0%) |
Colombia  |
2 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
2 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
2 (0%) |
Benin  |
1 (0%) |
Costa Rica  |
1 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
1 (0%) |
Seychelles  |
1 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
1 (0%) |
Botswana  |
1 (0%) |
Curacao  |
1 (0%) |
Estonia  |
1 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
1 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
1 (0%) |
Serbia  |
1 (0%) |
Peru  |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
1 (0%) |
Belize  |
1 (0%) |
Namibia  |
1 (0%) |
Azerbaijan  |
1 (0%) |
Ghana  |
1 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
1 (0%) |
Ecuador  |
1 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
1 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
1 (0%) |
Israel  |
1 (0%) |
Japan  |
1 (0%) |
Cambodia  |
1 (0%) |
Kyrgyzstan  |
1 (0%) |
Norway  |
1 (0%) |