LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- A Business process management approach to ERP implementation: A study of ERP implementation in the light of the third wave of Process Management
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2008
- Author/s
- Idorn, Niklas
- Department/s
- Department of Informatics
- In LUP since
- 2008-06-23
Downloads
Total | This Year | This Month |
6992 | 437 | 38 |
United States of America | 1018 (15%) |
India | 635 (9%) |
Germany | 565 (8%) |
Sweden | 299 (4%) |
Russian Federation | 249 (4%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 231 (3%) |
Indonesia | 208 (3%) |
Iran | 185 (3%) |
Australia | 176 (3%) |
Saudi Arabia | 166 (2%) |
France | 147 (2%) |
Canada | 142 (2%) |
Ukraine | 142 (2%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | 125 (2%) |
Pakistan | 99 (1%) |
China | 97 (1%) |
Malaysia | 97 (1%) |
South Africa | 96 (1%) |
Egypt | 81 (1%) |
Viet Nam | 76 (1%) |
Unknown | 75 (1%) |
Denmark | 71 (1%) |
Ethiopia | 71 (1%) |
Kenya | 70 (1%) |
Italy | 60 (1%) |
Singapore | 60 (1%) |
Belgium | 60 (1%) |
Poland | 57 (1%) |
Mexico | 54 (1%) |
Turkiye | 52 (1%) |
Philippines | 50 (1%) |
Nigeria | 49 (1%) |
Thailand | 47 (1%) |
Morocco | 47 (1%) |
Bulgaria | 45 (1%) |
United Arab Emirates | 45 (1%) |
Czechia | 44 (1%) |
Peru | 44 (1%) |
Switzerland | 43 (1%) |
Sri Lanka | 40 (1%) |
Brazil | 36 (1%) |
Romania | 36 (1%) |
Japan | 34 (0%) |
Hong Kong (China) | 32 (0%) |
Finland | 30 (0%) |
Lithuania | 29 (0%) |
Algeria | 29 (0%) |
Norway | 28 (0%) |
Austria | 26 (0%) |
Ireland | 26 (0%) |
Serbia | 25 (0%) |
Spain | 24 (0%) |
Mauritius | 23 (0%) |
Tunisia | 23 (0%) |
Greece | 22 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 21 (0%) |
Bangladesh | 21 (0%) |
Chile | 21 (0%) |
Colombia | 20 (0%) |
Oman | 18 (0%) |
Azerbaijan | 18 (0%) |
Yemen | 18 (0%) |
Portugal | 17 (0%) |
Ghana | 17 (0%) |
New Zealand | 17 (0%) |
Macedonia | 17 (0%) |
Zimbabwe | 16 (0%) |
Belarus | 16 (0%) |
Sudan | 15 (0%) |
Botswana | 13 (0%) |
South Korea | 13 (0%) |
Namibia | 13 (0%) |
Albania | 12 (0%) |
Latvia | 12 (0%) |
Angola | 10 (0%) |
Slovakia | 10 (0%) |
Croatia | 10 (0%) |
Taiwan (China) | 10 (0%) |
Israel | 10 (0%) |
Slovenia | 9 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of | 9 (0%) |
Uganda | 9 (0%) |
Jordan | 9 (0%) |
Kuwait | 8 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic | 8 (0%) |
Asia-Pacific location | 8 (0%) |
Ecuador | 7 (0%) |
Hungary | 7 (0%) |
Argentina | 7 (0%) |
Estonia | 7 (0%) |
Nepal | 7 (0%) |
Iraq | 7 (0%) |
Libya | 7 (0%) |
Lebanon | 7 (0%) |
Eritrea | 7 (0%) |
Nicaragua | 7 (0%) |
Zambia | 7 (0%) |
Bahrain | 6 (0%) |
Bolivia | 6 (0%) |
Luxembourg | 6 (0%) |
Maldives | 5 (0%) |
Qatar | 5 (0%) |
Suriname | 5 (0%) |
Cuba | 5 (0%) |
Mongolia | 5 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago | 5 (0%) |
Cameroon | 5 (0%) |
European Union location | 4 (0%) |
Jamaica | 4 (0%) |
Kazakhstan | 4 (0%) |
Afghanistan | 4 (0%) |
Myanmar | 4 (0%) |
Fiji | 4 (0%) |
Congo | 3 (0%) |
Uzbekistan | 3 (0%) |
Dominican Republic | 3 (0%) |
Georgia | 3 (0%) |
Malawi | 3 (0%) |
Saint Lucia | 3 (0%) |
Mozambique | 3 (0%) |
El Salvador | 3 (0%) |
Uruguay | 2 (0%) |
Guatemala | 2 (0%) |
Cambodia | 2 (0%) |
Costa Rica | 2 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire | 2 (0%) |
Unknown (Satellite Provider) | 2 (0%) |
Rwanda | 2 (0%) |
Cyprus | 2 (0%) |
Guam | 2 (0%) |
Venezuela | 2 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory | 2 (0%) |
Kyrgyzstan | 1 (0%) |
Eswatini | 1 (0%) |
Gabon | 1 (0%) |
Sao Tome and Principe | 1 (0%) |
Panama | 1 (0%) |
Niue | 1 (0%) |
Turkmenistan | 1 (0%) |
Dominica | 1 (0%) |
Djibouti | 1 (0%) |
Somalia | 1 (0%) |
Liberia | 1 (0%) |
Sierra Leone | 1 (0%) |
Samoa | 1 (0%) |
Gambia | 1 (0%) |
Honduras | 1 (0%) |
Paraguay | 1 (0%) |
Unknown (Anonymous Proxy) | 1 (0%) |
Tokelau | 1 (0%) |
Guyana | 1 (0%) |
Ă…land Islands | 1 (0%) |
Barbados | 1 (0%) |
South Sudan | 1 (0%) |
Malta | 1 (0%) |