LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- The effect of urbanization on protected areas. The impact of urban growth on a wildlife protected area: a case study of Nairobi National Park
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2009
- Author/s
- Mutuga, Flora
- Department/s
- The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics
- In LUP since
- 2009-12-01
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 7287 | 327 | 20 |
Kenya  |
1404 (19%) |
United States of America  |
1168 (16%) |
India  |
499 (7%) |
South Africa  |
268 (4%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
250 (3%) |
Philippines  |
202 (3%) |
Nigeria  |
197 (3%) |
Unknown  |
189 (3%) |
Ethiopia  |
172 (2%) |
Canada  |
165 (2%) |
European Union location  |
161 (2%) |
Australia  |
157 (2%) |
Sweden  |
140 (2%) |
China  |
138 (2%) |
Germany  |
109 (1%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
88 (1%) |
Pakistan  |
87 (1%) |
Uganda  |
78 (1%) |
Ghana  |
77 (1%) |
Malaysia  |
71 (1%) |
Zimbabwe  |
68 (1%) |
France  |
67 (1%) |
Russian Federation  |
67 (1%) |
Norway  |
63 (1%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
59 (1%) |
Viet Nam  |
54 (1%) |
Brazil  |
48 (1%) |
Mexico  |
48 (1%) |
Cameroon  |
46 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
44 (1%) |
Poland  |
35 (0%) |
Zambia  |
35 (0%) |
Singapore  |
34 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
33 (0%) |
Nepal  |
33 (0%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
33 (0%) |
Italy  |
32 (0%) |
Japan  |
31 (0%) |
South Korea  |
29 (0%) |
Indonesia  |
28 (0%) |
Iran  |
27 (0%) |
Malawi  |
25 (0%) |
Hungary  |
25 (0%) |
Mauritius  |
24 (0%) |
Thailand  |
22 (0%) |
Bhutan  |
22 (0%) |
Egypt  |
21 (0%) |
Bangladesh  |
20 (0%) |
Somalia  |
20 (0%) |
Chile  |
20 (0%) |
Botswana  |
19 (0%) |
Belgium  |
18 (0%) |
Ukraine  |
18 (0%) |
Spain  |
17 (0%) |
Namibia  |
15 (0%) |
Switzerland  |
15 (0%) |
Peru  |
15 (0%) |
Mongolia  |
14 (0%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
14 (0%) |
Greece  |
13 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
13 (0%) |
Argentina  |
13 (0%) |
Austria  |
13 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
12 (0%) |
Romania  |
11 (0%) |
Denmark  |
11 (0%) |
Colombia  |
10 (0%) |
Albania  |
10 (0%) |
Finland  |
10 (0%) |
Israel  |
10 (0%) |
Serbia  |
10 (0%) |
Portugal  |
10 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
9 (0%) |
Ireland  |
9 (0%) |
Eswatini  |
9 (0%) |
Myanmar  |
8 (0%) |
Iraq  |
8 (0%) |
Jamaica  |
8 (0%) |
Algeria  |
8 (0%) |
Puerto Rico  |
7 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
7 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
7 (0%) |
Czechia  |
7 (0%) |
Liberia  |
7 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
7 (0%) |
Unknown (Satellite Provider)  |
6 (0%) |
Qatar  |
6 (0%) |
Jordan  |
6 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
6 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire  |
6 (0%) |
Ecuador  |
5 (0%) |
Cambodia  |
5 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
5 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
5 (0%) |
Unknown (Anonymous Proxy)  |
5 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
4 (0%) |
Croatia  |
4 (0%) |
Mozambique  |
4 (0%) |
Bahamas  |
4 (0%) |
Uzbekistan  |
4 (0%) |
Sudan  |
4 (0%) |
Morocco  |
4 (0%) |
Benin  |
4 (0%) |
Venezuela  |
4 (0%) |
South Sudan  |
3 (0%) |
Togo  |
3 (0%) |
Asia-Pacific location  |
3 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
3 (0%) |
Guyana  |
3 (0%) |
Djibouti  |
3 (0%) |
Uruguay  |
3 (0%) |
Lesotho  |
3 (0%) |
Cyprus  |
3 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
3 (0%) |
Georgia  |
3 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
2 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
2 (0%) |
Bolivia  |
2 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
2 (0%) |
Fiji  |
2 (0%) |
Gambia  |
2 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
2 (0%) |
Malta  |
2 (0%) |
Nicaragua  |
2 (0%) |
Niger  |
1 (0%) |
Congo  |
1 (0%) |
Kyrgyzstan  |
1 (0%) |
Armenia  |
1 (0%) |
Paraguay  |
1 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam  |
1 (0%) |
Afghanistan  |
1 (0%) |
Barbados  |
1 (0%) |
Oman  |
1 (0%) |
El Salvador  |
1 (0%) |
Belarus  |
1 (0%) |
Azerbaijan  |
1 (0%) |
Costa Rica  |
1 (0%) |
Burkina Faso  |
1 (0%) |
Gabon  |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
1 (0%) |
Macao  |
1 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
1 (0%) |
Angola  |
1 (0%) |
Guatemala  |
1 (0%) |