LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- How SMEs make their decision for choosing an optimal ERP provider by using AHP method
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2010
- Author/s
- Boonyaprasit, Patchara; Yang, Sen
- Department/s
- Department of Informatics
- In LUP since
- 2010-06-10
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 1884 | 20 | 1 |
United States of America  |
229 (12%) |
India  |
184 (10%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
164 (9%) |
Malaysia  |
79 (4%) |
Turkiye  |
78 (4%) |
Indonesia  |
72 (4%) |
Germany  |
65 (3%) |
Australia  |
58 (3%) |
Iran  |
53 (3%) |
Canada  |
50 (3%) |
China  |
43 (2%) |
Sweden  |
38 (2%) |
South Africa  |
33 (2%) |
Thailand  |
30 (2%) |
Finland  |
30 (2%) |
Singapore  |
28 (1%) |
France  |
26 (1%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
26 (1%) |
Viet Nam  |
25 (1%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
23 (1%) |
Morocco  |
23 (1%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
23 (1%) |
Philippines  |
21 (1%) |
Pakistan  |
18 (1%) |
Egypt  |
17 (1%) |
Kenya  |
17 (1%) |
Ethiopia  |
16 (1%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
15 (1%) |
Japan  |
15 (1%) |
Russian Federation  |
15 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
14 (1%) |
Brazil  |
14 (1%) |
Ireland  |
11 (1%) |
Romania  |
11 (1%) |
Lithuania  |
10 (1%) |
Bulgaria  |
10 (1%) |
South Korea  |
9 (0%) |
Namibia  |
9 (0%) |
Uganda  |
9 (0%) |
European Union location  |
8 (0%) |
Italy  |
8 (0%) |
Portugal  |
8 (0%) |
Oman  |
8 (0%) |
Greece  |
8 (0%) |
Ghana  |
7 (0%) |
Sudan  |
7 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
7 (0%) |
Croatia  |
6 (0%) |
Norway  |
6 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
6 (0%) |
Switzerland  |
6 (0%) |
Poland  |
6 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
6 (0%) |
Hungary  |
6 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
6 (0%) |
Nigeria  |
6 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
6 (0%) |
Spain  |
6 (0%) |
Ukraine  |
5 (0%) |
Czechia  |
5 (0%) |
Jordan  |
5 (0%) |
Belgium  |
5 (0%) |
Serbia  |
5 (0%) |
Asia-Pacific location  |
5 (0%) |
Denmark  |
5 (0%) |
Bangladesh  |
5 (0%) |
Austria  |
5 (0%) |
Iraq  |
5 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
4 (0%) |
Mexico  |
4 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
4 (0%) |
Zambia  |
4 (0%) |
Israel  |
4 (0%) |
Botswana  |
4 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
4 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
4 (0%) |
Malawi  |
3 (0%) |
Mauritius  |
3 (0%) |
Algeria  |
3 (0%) |
Bhutan  |
3 (0%) |
Yemen  |
3 (0%) |
Libya  |
3 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory  |
3 (0%) |
Colombia  |
3 (0%) |
Qatar  |
2 (0%) |
Georgia  |
2 (0%) |
Estonia  |
2 (0%) |
Cayman Islands  |
2 (0%) |
Peru  |
2 (0%) |
Cyprus  |
2 (0%) |
Unknown  |
2 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
2 (0%) |
Cameroon  |
2 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
2 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam  |
1 (0%) |
Zimbabwe  |
1 (0%) |
Bolivia  |
1 (0%) |
Mongolia  |
1 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
1 (0%) |
Solomon Islands  |
1 (0%) |
Costa Rica  |
1 (0%) |
Venezuela  |
1 (0%) |
Saint Lucia  |
1 (0%) |
Afghanistan  |
1 (0%) |
Armenia  |
1 (0%) |
Madagascar  |
1 (0%) |
Uruguay  |
1 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
1 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
1 (0%) |
Fiji  |
1 (0%) |
Albania  |
1 (0%) |
Nepal  |
1 (0%) |
Chile  |
1 (0%) |
Cuba  |
1 (0%) |