LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Anti-dumping as protectionism in the EU? – A case study of shoe imports from China and Vietnam.
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2010
- Author/s
- Ahrén, Maria
- Department/s
- Department of Economics
- In LUP since
- 2010-06-17
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 5295 | 42 | 1 |
United States of America  |
557 (11%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
483 (9%) |
Viet Nam  |
393 (7%) |
Malaysia  |
380 (7%) |
China  |
339 (6%) |
India  |
318 (6%) |
Germany  |
209 (4%) |
France  |
157 (3%) |
Belgium  |
131 (2%) |
Singapore  |
130 (2%) |
Italy  |
106 (2%) |
Australia  |
105 (2%) |
Indonesia  |
104 (2%) |
Philippines  |
104 (2%) |
Sweden  |
95 (2%) |
Spain  |
87 (2%) |
Canada  |
83 (2%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
82 (2%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
82 (2%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
78 (1%) |
South Korea  |
75 (1%) |
Poland  |
72 (1%) |
Romania  |
58 (1%) |
Azerbaijan  |
48 (1%) |
Russian Federation  |
44 (1%) |
Ukraine  |
41 (1%) |
Switzerland  |
41 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
39 (1%) |
Czechia  |
38 (1%) |
Thailand  |
38 (1%) |
Portugal  |
37 (1%) |
Denmark  |
28 (1%) |
South Africa  |
27 (1%) |
Unknown  |
26 (0%) |
Pakistan  |
25 (0%) |
Japan  |
22 (0%) |
Bangladesh  |
22 (0%) |
Brazil  |
21 (0%) |
Hungary  |
21 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
21 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
21 (0%) |
Finland  |
20 (0%) |
Greece  |
20 (0%) |
Cambodia  |
19 (0%) |
Peru  |
19 (0%) |
Ireland  |
18 (0%) |
Macao  |
18 (0%) |
Egypt  |
17 (0%) |
Austria  |
17 (0%) |
Ethiopia  |
16 (0%) |
Mexico  |
13 (0%) |
European Union location  |
12 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
12 (0%) |
Kenya  |
12 (0%) |
Belarus  |
11 (0%) |
Colombia  |
11 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
10 (0%) |
Jordan  |
10 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
10 (0%) |
Myanmar  |
10 (0%) |
Iran  |
9 (0%) |
Ghana  |
9 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
9 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
9 (0%) |
Serbia  |
7 (0%) |
Albania  |
7 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
7 (0%) |
Norway  |
7 (0%) |
Monaco  |
6 (0%) |
Ecuador  |
6 (0%) |
Nigeria  |
6 (0%) |
Zimbabwe  |
6 (0%) |
Asia-Pacific location  |
6 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
6 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
5 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
5 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
5 (0%) |
Croatia  |
5 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
5 (0%) |
Estonia  |
5 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam  |
5 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
5 (0%) |
Namibia  |
4 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
4 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire  |
4 (0%) |
Mauritius  |
4 (0%) |
Jamaica  |
4 (0%) |
Uzbekistan  |
4 (0%) |
Israel  |
4 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory  |
4 (0%) |
Iraq  |
3 (0%) |
Oman  |
3 (0%) |
Nepal  |
3 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
3 (0%) |
Argentina  |
3 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
2 (0%) |
Morocco  |
2 (0%) |
Costa Rica  |
2 (0%) |
Georgia  |
2 (0%) |
Afghanistan  |
2 (0%) |
Latvia  |
2 (0%) |
Unknown (Satellite Provider)  |
2 (0%) |
Nicaragua  |
2 (0%) |
Barbados  |
2 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic  |
2 (0%) |
Benin  |
2 (0%) |
Unknown (Anonymous Proxy)  |
2 (0%) |
Qatar  |
2 (0%) |
Chile  |
2 (0%) |
Zambia  |
1 (0%) |
El Salvador  |
1 (0%) |
Gambia  |
1 (0%) |
Malta  |
1 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
1 (0%) |
Senegal  |
1 (0%) |
Maldives  |
1 (0%) |
Liechtenstein  |
1 (0%) |
Dominican Republic  |
1 (0%) |
Angola  |
1 (0%) |
Sudan  |
1 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
1 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
1 (0%) |
Botswana  |
1 (0%) |
Fiji  |
1 (0%) |