LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- An empirical evaluation of Value-at-Risk during the financial crisis
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2010
- Author/s
- Selling, Daniel; Norling, Nicklas
- Department/s
- Department of Business Administration
- In LUP since
- 2010-06-04
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 4544 | 584 | 9 |
United States of America  |
735 (16%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
684 (15%) |
Germany  |
344 (8%) |
Sweden  |
285 (6%) |
Poland  |
132 (3%) |
France  |
129 (3%) |
India  |
128 (3%) |
China  |
103 (2%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
92 (2%) |
Singapore  |
91 (2%) |
Russian Federation  |
90 (2%) |
Canada  |
82 (2%) |
Malaysia  |
77 (2%) |
Australia  |
76 (2%) |
Italy  |
72 (2%) |
Indonesia  |
64 (1%) |
South Africa  |
61 (1%) |
Viet Nam  |
60 (1%) |
Greece  |
56 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
51 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
50 (1%) |
Switzerland  |
49 (1%) |
Spain  |
48 (1%) |
Ireland  |
39 (1%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
39 (1%) |
Denmark  |
37 (1%) |
Portugal  |
34 (1%) |
Belgium  |
29 (1%) |
Austria  |
28 (1%) |
Unknown  |
26 (1%) |
Mauritius  |
26 (1%) |
Iran  |
25 (1%) |
Nigeria  |
23 (1%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
23 (1%) |
Luxembourg  |
21 (0%) |
Thailand  |
21 (0%) |
Japan  |
21 (0%) |
Czechia  |
21 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
19 (0%) |
Romania  |
19 (0%) |
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines  |
19 (0%) |
Mexico  |
19 (0%) |
Kenya  |
18 (0%) |
Brazil  |
17 (0%) |
Cyprus  |
17 (0%) |
Norway  |
17 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
17 (0%) |
Pakistan  |
16 (0%) |
Serbia  |
16 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
16 (0%) |
Argentina  |
15 (0%) |
Hungary  |
15 (0%) |
Morocco  |
14 (0%) |
Philippines  |
14 (0%) |
Zimbabwe  |
12 (0%) |
Finland  |
12 (0%) |
Peru  |
11 (0%) |
Israel  |
10 (0%) |
South Korea  |
10 (0%) |
Colombia  |
10 (0%) |
Algeria  |
10 (0%) |
Egypt  |
10 (0%) |
Oman  |
9 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
9 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
8 (0%) |
Croatia  |
8 (0%) |
Malta  |
7 (0%) |
European Union location  |
7 (0%) |
Belarus  |
5 (0%) |
Albania  |
5 (0%) |
Armenia  |
5 (0%) |
Estonia  |
5 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
5 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
5 (0%) |
Uruguay  |
5 (0%) |
Chile  |
4 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
4 (0%) |
Qatar  |
4 (0%) |
Zambia  |
4 (0%) |
Ghana  |
4 (0%) |
Fiji  |
3 (0%) |
Cameroon  |
3 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
3 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire  |
3 (0%) |
Ukraine  |
3 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
2 (0%) |
Venezuela  |
2 (0%) |
Benin  |
2 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
2 (0%) |
Mongolia  |
2 (0%) |
Uzbekistan  |
2 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
2 (0%) |
Eswatini  |
2 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
2 (0%) |
Iraq  |
2 (0%) |
Sudan  |
2 (0%) |
Jamaica  |
2 (0%) |
Jordan  |
2 (0%) |
Senegal  |
1 (0%) |
Panama  |
1 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam  |
1 (0%) |
Paraguay  |
1 (0%) |
Bahamas  |
1 (0%) |
Turkmenistan  |
1 (0%) |
Grenada  |
1 (0%) |
Cambodia  |
1 (0%) |
Macao  |
1 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
1 (0%) |
Saint Kitts and Nevis  |
1 (0%) |
Iceland  |
1 (0%) |
Saint Lucia  |
1 (0%) |
Honduras  |
1 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
1 (0%) |
Botswana  |
1 (0%) |
Burkina Faso  |
1 (0%) |
Guyana  |
1 (0%) |
Unknown (Anonymous Proxy)  |
1 (0%) |
Antigua and Barbuda  |
1 (0%) |
Libya  |
1 (0%) |
Congo  |
1 (0%) |
Gambia  |
1 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic  |
1 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
1 (0%) |
Dominica  |
1 (0%) |
Congo  |
1 (0%) |
Namibia  |
1 (0%) |
Azerbaijan  |
1 (0%) |
Georgia  |
1 (0%) |
Nepal  |
1 (0%) |