LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Planning for Supplier Base Reduction - understanding Supplier Base Reduction´s role in purchasing
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2011
- Author/s
- Karlsson, Fabian; Eriksson-Ritzén, Sebastian
- Department/s
- Engineering Logistics
- In LUP since
- 2011-03-24
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 5324 | 57 | 6 |
United States of America  |
650 (12%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
609 (11%) |
Germany  |
531 (10%) |
Sweden  |
389 (7%) |
India  |
288 (5%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
152 (3%) |
China  |
149 (3%) |
France  |
147 (3%) |
Uganda  |
136 (3%) |
Kenya  |
129 (2%) |
European Union location  |
128 (2%) |
Zimbabwe  |
126 (2%) |
Malaysia  |
124 (2%) |
Singapore  |
111 (2%) |
South Africa  |
94 (2%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
87 (2%) |
Ghana  |
85 (2%) |
Canada  |
81 (2%) |
Italy  |
73 (1%) |
Denmark  |
65 (1%) |
Norway  |
65 (1%) |
Philippines  |
55 (1%) |
Australia  |
51 (1%) |
Malawi  |
46 (1%) |
Thailand  |
44 (1%) |
Finland  |
44 (1%) |
Pakistan  |
44 (1%) |
Unknown  |
43 (1%) |
Russian Federation  |
42 (1%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
33 (1%) |
Viet Nam  |
30 (1%) |
Mexico  |
30 (1%) |
Iran  |
29 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
28 (1%) |
Belgium  |
28 (1%) |
Switzerland  |
27 (1%) |
Spain  |
27 (1%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
27 (1%) |
Indonesia  |
25 (0%) |
Ukraine  |
25 (0%) |
Ireland  |
23 (0%) |
Brazil  |
23 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
21 (0%) |
Austria  |
21 (0%) |
Nigeria  |
21 (0%) |
Poland  |
20 (0%) |
Asia-Pacific location  |
20 (0%) |
Czechia  |
19 (0%) |
Japan  |
19 (0%) |
South Korea  |
19 (0%) |
Egypt  |
18 (0%) |
Zambia  |
15 (0%) |
Ethiopia  |
14 (0%) |
Hungary  |
11 (0%) |
Namibia  |
10 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
8 (0%) |
Bangladesh  |
8 (0%) |
Portugal  |
8 (0%) |
Morocco  |
8 (0%) |
Mauritius  |
7 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
6 (0%) |
Botswana  |
6 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
6 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
5 (0%) |
Oman  |
5 (0%) |
Qatar  |
5 (0%) |
Romania  |
5 (0%) |
Colombia  |
4 (0%) |
Greece  |
4 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
4 (0%) |
Iraq  |
3 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
3 (0%) |
Puerto Rico  |
3 (0%) |
Macao  |
3 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
3 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
2 (0%) |
Latvia  |
2 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
2 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
2 (0%) |
Senegal  |
2 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
2 (0%) |
Cyprus  |
2 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory  |
2 (0%) |
Albania  |
2 (0%) |
Estonia  |
2 (0%) |
Libya  |
1 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
1 (0%) |
Costa Rica  |
1 (0%) |
Serbia  |
1 (0%) |
Timor-Leste  |
1 (0%) |
Croatia  |
1 (0%) |
Mali  |
1 (0%) |
Peru  |
1 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam  |
1 (0%) |
Guatemala  |
1 (0%) |
Gibraltar  |
1 (0%) |
Saint Lucia  |
1 (0%) |
Panama  |
1 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire  |
1 (0%) |
Eritrea  |
1 (0%) |
Congo  |
1 (0%) |
Jamaica  |
1 (0%) |
Angola  |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
1 (0%) |
Yemen  |
1 (0%) |
Unknown (Anonymous Proxy)  |
1 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
1 (0%) |
Fiji  |
1 (0%) |
Falkland Islands (The) [Malvinas]  |
1 (0%) |
Bolivia  |
1 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
1 (0%) |
Mongolia  |
1 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
1 (0%) |
Unknown (Satellite Provider)  |
1 (0%) |