LUP Statistics

Record

Title

Sweden’s Forfeiture Regime in a Time of Change - A comparative study of Swedish and Australian law regarding forfeiture of unexplained wealth

Type

Student Paper

Publ. year

2012

Author/s

Andersson, Ida

Department/s

Department of Law

In LUP since

2012-08-31

Total	This Year	This Month
1018	51	3

Downloads per country

Sweden	235 (23%)
United States of America	145 (14%)
China	68 (7%)
Germany	64 (6%)
Australia	46 (5%)
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland	43 (4%)
Canada	24 (2%)
Bulgaria	22 (2%)
Poland	20 (2%)
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)	19 (2%)
Indonesia	15 (1%)
Thailand	14 (1%)
Ukraine	12 (1%)
Kenya	12 (1%)
Russian Federation	11 (1%)
South Africa	11 (1%)
Singapore	11 (1%)
Finland	10 (1%)
Taiwan (China)	10 (1%)
France	9 (1%)
Hong Kong (China)	9 (1%)
Mauritius	8 (1%)
Japan	7 (1%)
Nigeria	7 (1%)
Luxembourg	7 (1%)
Philippines	7 (1%)
India	6 (1%)
Malaysia	6 (1%)
Ethiopia	6 (1%)
Romania	6 (1%)
Viet Nam	5 (0%)
Portugal	5 (0%)
Switzerland	5 (0%)
Unknown	5 (0%)
Trinidad and Tobago	5 (0%)
Czechia	5 (0%)
Italy	5 (0%)
Tanzania, the United Republic of	5 (0%)
Belgium	5 (0%)
Spain	4 (0%)
Israel	4 (0%)
Lithuania	4 (0%)
Slovenia	4 (0%)
Latvia	4 (0%)
Albania	3 (0%)
Serbia	3 (0%)
Turkiye	3 (0%)
Zambia	3 (0%)
Eswatini	3 (0%)
Austria	3 (0%)
Macedonia	3 (0%)
Norway	3 (0%)
Fiji	3 (0%)
Denmark	3 (0%)
Iran	2 (0%)
Morocco	2 (0%)
Ghana	2 (0%)
Moldova, The Republic of	2 (0%)
Cyprus	2 (0%)
Greece	2 (0%)
Brazil	2 (0%)
Estonia	2 (0%)
Ecuador	2 (0%)
Colombia	2 (0%)
Armenia	2 (0%)
United Arab Emirates	2 (0%)
New Zealand	2 (0%)
Andorra	1 (0%)
Malawi	1 (0%)
Saudi Arabia	1 (0%)
Iceland	1 (0%)
Croatia	1 (0%)
Argentina	1 (0%)
Belarus	1 (0%)
Cayman Islands	1 (0%)
Cote d'Ivoire	1 (0%)
Hungary	1 (0%)
European Union location	1 (0%)
Brunei Darussalam	1 (0%)
Lebanon	1 (0%)
Antigua and Barbuda	1 (0%)
Ireland	1 (0%)
Slovakia	1 (0%)
Kazakhstan	1 (0%)
Macao	1 (0%)
Egypt	1 (0%)
Cameroon	1 (0%)
Jordan	1 (0%)
Malta	1 (0%)
Algeria	1 (0%)
Georgia	1 (0%)