LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Food waste prevention in quick service restaurants: A comparative case study on the quantity, source, costs and cause
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2013
- Author/s
- Drewitt, Tess
- Department/s
- The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics
- In LUP since
- 2013-10-08
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 6040 | 0 | 0 |
Philippines  |
1028 (17%) |
United States of America  |
947 (16%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
368 (6%) |
India  |
357 (6%) |
Sweden  |
261 (4%) |
Malaysia  |
224 (4%) |
Germany  |
186 (3%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
175 (3%) |
France  |
137 (2%) |
Unknown  |
117 (2%) |
South Africa  |
114 (2%) |
Australia  |
109 (2%) |
Turkiye  |
108 (2%) |
China  |
103 (2%) |
Canada  |
94 (2%) |
Kenya  |
86 (1%) |
Nigeria  |
83 (1%) |
Thailand  |
82 (1%) |
Indonesia  |
71 (1%) |
Pakistan  |
68 (1%) |
Russian Federation  |
65 (1%) |
Ireland  |
53 (1%) |
Singapore  |
53 (1%) |
Switzerland  |
53 (1%) |
Ghana  |
50 (1%) |
Egypt  |
45 (1%) |
Brazil  |
45 (1%) |
New Zealand  |
44 (1%) |
Italy  |
41 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
37 (1%) |
Finland  |
36 (1%) |
Romania  |
35 (1%) |
Ukraine  |
32 (1%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
30 (1%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
30 (1%) |
Mauritius  |
27 (0%) |
Denmark  |
27 (0%) |
Greece  |
27 (0%) |
Viet Nam  |
26 (0%) |
Czechia  |
24 (0%) |
Zimbabwe  |
24 (0%) |
Spain  |
23 (0%) |
Japan  |
21 (0%) |
Nepal  |
20 (0%) |
Bangladesh  |
20 (0%) |
Norway  |
18 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
16 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
16 (0%) |
Poland  |
15 (0%) |
Mexico  |
14 (0%) |
Portugal  |
14 (0%) |
Ethiopia  |
13 (0%) |
Austria  |
13 (0%) |
Peru  |
13 (0%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
12 (0%) |
Botswana  |
11 (0%) |
Belgium  |
11 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
10 (0%) |
Iran  |
9 (0%) |
European Union location  |
9 (0%) |
South Korea  |
8 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
8 (0%) |
Hungary  |
8 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
7 (0%) |
Morocco  |
7 (0%) |
Malta  |
7 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam  |
6 (0%) |
Somalia  |
6 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
5 (0%) |
Israel  |
5 (0%) |
Sudan  |
5 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
5 (0%) |
Latvia  |
5 (0%) |
Puerto Rico  |
5 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
4 (0%) |
Estonia  |
4 (0%) |
Costa Rica  |
4 (0%) |
Chile  |
4 (0%) |
Serbia  |
4 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
4 (0%) |
Qatar  |
4 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
4 (0%) |
Colombia  |
3 (0%) |
Uganda  |
3 (0%) |
Jamaica  |
3 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory  |
3 (0%) |
Azerbaijan  |
3 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire  |
3 (0%) |
Cameroon  |
3 (0%) |
Jordan  |
3 (0%) |
Albania  |
3 (0%) |
Argentina  |
3 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
3 (0%) |
Belarus  |
2 (0%) |
Myanmar  |
2 (0%) |
Malawi  |
2 (0%) |
Namibia  |
2 (0%) |
Croatia  |
2 (0%) |
Unknown (Satellite Provider)  |
2 (0%) |
Macao  |
2 (0%) |
Bhutan  |
2 (0%) |
Zambia  |
2 (0%) |
Papua New Guinea  |
2 (0%) |
Algeria  |
2 (0%) |
Mongolia  |
2 (0%) |
Iceland  |
2 (0%) |
Cambodia  |
2 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
1 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
1 (0%) |
Honduras  |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
1 (0%) |
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba  |
1 (0%) |
South Sudan  |
1 (0%) |
Libya  |
1 (0%) |
Suriname  |
1 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
1 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
1 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
1 (0%) |
Curacao  |
1 (0%) |
Uzbekistan  |
1 (0%) |
Cuba  |
1 (0%) |
Oman  |
1 (0%) |
Maldives  |
1 (0%) |
Georgia  |
1 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic  |
1 (0%) |
Cyprus  |
1 (0%) |
Angola  |
1 (0%) |