Skip to main content
Record
Title
Preferential trade agreements and bilateral trade flow in Latin America
Type
Student Paper
Publ. year
2014
Author/s
Olsson, Axel
Department/s
Department of Economics
In LUP since
2014-02-12
Downloads

Total This Year This Month
347 7 0
Downloads per country

Sweden 59 (17%)
United States of America 54 (16%)
Germany 29 (8%)
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 11 (3%)
France 10 (3%)
Pakistan 9 (3%)
Russian Federation 9 (3%)
Jordan 8 (2%)
Nigeria 8 (2%)
India 7 (2%)
Algeria 6 (2%)
Australia 6 (2%)
Taiwan (China) 6 (2%)
Mauritius 5 (1%)
China 5 (1%)
Indonesia 5 (1%)
Zimbabwe 5 (1%)
Turkiye 4 (1%)
Greece 4 (1%)
South Africa 4 (1%)
Iran 4 (1%)
Ethiopia 3 (1%)
Morocco 3 (1%)
Peru 3 (1%)
Singapore 3 (1%)
Canada 3 (1%)
Czechia 3 (1%)
Japan 3 (1%)
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 3 (1%)
Egypt 2 (1%)
Malaysia 2 (1%)
Finland 2 (1%)
Brazil 2 (1%)
Palestinian Territory 2 (1%)
Hungary 2 (1%)
Serbia 2 (1%)
Cameroon 2 (1%)
Unknown 2 (1%)
South Korea 2 (1%)
Tunisia 2 (1%)
Poland 2 (1%)
Tanzania, the United Republic of 2 (1%)
Dominican Republic 2 (1%)
Mexico 2 (1%)
Portugal 2 (1%)
Belgium 2 (1%)
Moldova, The Republic of 2 (1%)
Thailand 1 (0%)
Sri Lanka 1 (0%)
European Union location 1 (0%)
Paraguay 1 (0%)
Bulgaria 1 (0%)
Zambia 1 (0%)
Ecuador 1 (0%)
Cote d'Ivoire 1 (0%)
Switzerland 1 (0%)
Colombia 1 (0%)
Ghana 1 (0%)
Sierra Leone 1 (0%)
Azerbaijan 1 (0%)
Kenya 1 (0%)
Bangladesh 1 (0%)
Trinidad and Tobago 1 (0%)
Kazakhstan 1 (0%)
Romania 1 (0%)
Luxembourg 1 (0%)
Norway 1 (0%)
Albania 1 (0%)
Venezuela 1 (0%)
Spain 1 (0%)
Argentina 1 (0%)
Viet Nam 1 (0%)
Austria 1 (0%)
Benin 1 (0%)
Israel 1 (0%)
Senegal 1 (0%)
About
The download statistics shown here have been collected since the launch of LUP in October 2007 and are updated every night. Statistics are available for all records with open access fulltexts. Efforts have been made to exclude downloads by robots and track irregular download activities.

About accessibility

Disclaimer
The information on downloads per country is based on the geolocation of IP addresses and may not be completely accurate. The statistics presented here may also change retroactively when the calculation process is improved to provide more accurate results.

Statistics Last Updated
Sun Jul 7 08:25:21 2024