LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Urban land-use planning using Geographical Information System and Analytical Hierarchy Process : case study Dhaka city
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2014
- Author/s
- Ullah, Kazi Masel
- Department/s
- Dept of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science
- In LUP since
- 2014-11-05
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 6470 | 565 | 21 |
Ethiopia  |
715 (11%) |
United States of America  |
609 (9%) |
India  |
590 (9%) |
Bangladesh  |
393 (6%) |
Nigeria  |
280 (4%) |
Germany  |
274 (4%) |
Russian Federation  |
249 (4%) |
South Africa  |
176 (3%) |
Philippines  |
170 (3%) |
Malaysia  |
147 (2%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
135 (2%) |
Unknown  |
132 (2%) |
Pakistan  |
123 (2%) |
Iran  |
122 (2%) |
Sweden  |
121 (2%) |
Kenya  |
104 (2%) |
Zimbabwe  |
95 (1%) |
Myanmar  |
91 (1%) |
China  |
90 (1%) |
Ghana  |
82 (1%) |
Indonesia  |
74 (1%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
67 (1%) |
Egypt  |
66 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
66 (1%) |
France  |
64 (1%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
62 (1%) |
Thailand  |
61 (1%) |
Iraq  |
55 (1%) |
Uganda  |
48 (1%) |
Canada  |
46 (1%) |
Nepal  |
41 (1%) |
Viet Nam  |
39 (1%) |
Zambia  |
38 (1%) |
Australia  |
37 (1%) |
Sri Lanka  |
34 (1%) |
Romania  |
32 (0%) |
Japan  |
32 (0%) |
European Union location  |
32 (0%) |
Peru  |
31 (0%) |
Czechia  |
30 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
28 (0%) |
Jordan  |
27 (0%) |
Singapore  |
26 (0%) |
Malawi  |
26 (0%) |
Ukraine  |
25 (0%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
23 (0%) |
Algeria  |
22 (0%) |
Cameroon  |
22 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
22 (0%) |
South Korea  |
21 (0%) |
Brazil  |
18 (0%) |
Italy  |
18 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory  |
17 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
17 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
16 (0%) |
Greece  |
16 (0%) |
Morocco  |
15 (0%) |
Poland  |
15 (0%) |
Eritrea  |
15 (0%) |
Sudan  |
15 (0%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
14 (0%) |
Chile  |
13 (0%) |
Finland  |
13 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
13 (0%) |
Albania  |
12 (0%) |
Norway  |
12 (0%) |
Malta  |
11 (0%) |
Namibia  |
10 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
10 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam  |
10 (0%) |
Ireland  |
10 (0%) |
Mexico  |
9 (0%) |
Belgium  |
9 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
9 (0%) |
Portugal  |
9 (0%) |
Latvia  |
9 (0%) |
Belarus  |
9 (0%) |
Mauritius  |
8 (0%) |
Uzbekistan  |
8 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
8 (0%) |
Serbia  |
8 (0%) |
Guyana  |
7 (0%) |
Spain  |
7 (0%) |
Switzerland  |
7 (0%) |
Cyprus  |
7 (0%) |
Cambodia  |
6 (0%) |
Colombia  |
6 (0%) |
Libya  |
6 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
6 (0%) |
Solomon Islands  |
6 (0%) |
Lesotho  |
5 (0%) |
Mongolia  |
5 (0%) |
Austria  |
5 (0%) |
Central African Republic  |
5 (0%) |
Iceland  |
5 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
5 (0%) |
Somalia  |
5 (0%) |
Denmark  |
4 (0%) |
Yemen  |
4 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
4 (0%) |
Israel  |
4 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire  |
4 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
4 (0%) |
Eswatini  |
3 (0%) |
South Sudan  |
3 (0%) |
Costa Rica  |
3 (0%) |
Qatar  |
3 (0%) |
Botswana  |
3 (0%) |
Afghanistan  |
3 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
3 (0%) |
Papua New Guinea  |
3 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
3 (0%) |
Azerbaijan  |
3 (0%) |
Hungary  |
3 (0%) |
Unknown (Satellite Provider)  |
2 (0%) |
Bhutan  |
2 (0%) |
Bolivia  |
2 (0%) |
Asia-Pacific location  |
2 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
2 (0%) |
Croatia  |
2 (0%) |
Fiji  |
2 (0%) |
Madagascar  |
2 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic  |
2 (0%) |
Jamaica  |
2 (0%) |
Kyrgyzstan  |
2 (0%) |
Timor-Leste  |
2 (0%) |
Oman  |
2 (0%) |
Georgia  |
2 (0%) |
XK  |
2 (0%) |
Puerto Rico  |
2 (0%) |
Dominican Republic  |
2 (0%) |
Senegal  |
1 (0%) |
Mozambique  |
1 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
1 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
1 (0%) |
Paraguay  |
1 (0%) |
Panama  |
1 (0%) |
Haiti  |
1 (0%) |
Armenia  |
1 (0%) |
Togo  |
1 (0%) |
Burkina Faso  |
1 (0%) |
Suriname  |
1 (0%) |
Dominica  |
1 (0%) |
El Salvador  |
1 (0%) |
Uruguay  |
1 (0%) |
Guatemala  |
1 (0%) |
Seychelles  |
1 (0%) |