LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- E-Government and its ability to reduce corruption - The case of Estonia
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2015
- Author/s
- Karv, Jaanus
- Department/s
- Department of Political Science
- In LUP since
- 2015-07-13
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 4382 | 0 | 0 |
United States of America  |
669 (15%) |
India  |
667 (15%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
217 (5%) |
Indonesia  |
123 (3%) |
Ethiopia  |
120 (3%) |
Germany  |
109 (3%) |
Malaysia  |
105 (2%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
102 (2%) |
Unknown  |
92 (2%) |
Nigeria  |
83 (2%) |
Estonia  |
78 (2%) |
Egypt  |
74 (2%) |
South Africa  |
69 (2%) |
Sweden  |
64 (1%) |
Bangladesh  |
63 (1%) |
Pakistan  |
63 (1%) |
China  |
62 (1%) |
Russian Federation  |
59 (1%) |
Kenya  |
47 (1%) |
Canada  |
46 (1%) |
Iran  |
46 (1%) |
Greece  |
42 (1%) |
Romania  |
39 (1%) |
Philippines  |
36 (1%) |
France  |
35 (1%) |
Ukraine  |
34 (1%) |
Somalia  |
33 (1%) |
Iraq  |
32 (1%) |
South Korea  |
31 (1%) |
Denmark  |
31 (1%) |
Japan  |
30 (1%) |
Brazil  |
29 (1%) |
Zimbabwe  |
29 (1%) |
Lebanon  |
27 (1%) |
Czechia  |
27 (1%) |
Nepal  |
27 (1%) |
Australia  |
26 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
25 (1%) |
Kazakhstan  |
25 (1%) |
Lithuania  |
24 (1%) |
Albania  |
23 (1%) |
Italy  |
23 (1%) |
Algeria  |
23 (1%) |
Spain  |
22 (1%) |
Ghana  |
21 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
21 (0%) |
Switzerland  |
20 (0%) |
Ireland  |
19 (0%) |
Ecuador  |
19 (0%) |
Singapore  |
19 (0%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
18 (0%) |
Oman  |
18 (0%) |
Thailand  |
18 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
17 (0%) |
Afghanistan  |
17 (0%) |
Peru  |
16 (0%) |
Hungary  |
15 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
15 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
15 (0%) |
Viet Nam  |
14 (0%) |
Austria  |
14 (0%) |
Zambia  |
13 (0%) |
Uzbekistan  |
13 (0%) |
Uganda  |
13 (0%) |
Azerbaijan  |
13 (0%) |
Myanmar  |
13 (0%) |
Jordan  |
13 (0%) |
Jamaica  |
13 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
13 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
12 (0%) |
Armenia  |
12 (0%) |
Qatar  |
12 (0%) |
Mexico  |
12 (0%) |
Yemen  |
12 (0%) |
Poland  |
10 (0%) |
Croatia  |
10 (0%) |
Mozambique  |
9 (0%) |
Norway  |
9 (0%) |
Israel  |
9 (0%) |
Finland  |
9 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
8 (0%) |
Portugal  |
8 (0%) |
Colombia  |
8 (0%) |
Mongolia  |
8 (0%) |
Morocco  |
7 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
7 (0%) |
Sudan  |
7 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory  |
7 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
6 (0%) |
Belgium  |
6 (0%) |
Cyprus  |
6 (0%) |
Georgia  |
5 (0%) |
Kyrgyzstan  |
5 (0%) |
Serbia  |
5 (0%) |
Seychelles  |
5 (0%) |
Chile  |
5 (0%) |
Belize  |
4 (0%) |
Cambodia  |
4 (0%) |
Botswana  |
4 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
4 (0%) |
Fiji  |
4 (0%) |
Venezuela  |
4 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
4 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire  |
4 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
4 (0%) |
Malta  |
3 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
3 (0%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
3 (0%) |
Malawi  |
3 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
3 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
3 (0%) |
Mauritius  |
3 (0%) |
Cameroon  |
3 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
3 (0%) |
Congo  |
2 (0%) |
Namibia  |
2 (0%) |
Papua New Guinea  |
2 (0%) |
Argentina  |
2 (0%) |
Panama  |
2 (0%) |
Belarus  |
2 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
2 (0%) |
Paraguay  |
1 (0%) |
Bhutan  |
1 (0%) |
Benin  |
1 (0%) |
XK  |
1 (0%) |
Dominican Republic  |
1 (0%) |
Solomon Islands  |
1 (0%) |
Eritrea  |
1 (0%) |
Latvia  |
1 (0%) |
Maldives  |
1 (0%) |
Libya  |
1 (0%) |
Guinea  |
1 (0%) |
Honduras  |
1 (0%) |
United States Minor Outlying Islands  |
1 (0%) |
South Sudan  |
1 (0%) |
Liberia  |
1 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam  |
1 (0%) |
Togo  |
1 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
1 (0%) |
Madagascar  |
1 (0%) |