LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- How can the concept of flexicurity be implemented through legislation? - A study between Danish flexicurity and Swedish job security
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2016
- Author/s
- Lindqvist, Camilla
- Department/s
- Department of Business Law
- In LUP since
- 2016-01-20
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 311 | 27 | 0 |
United States of America  |
76 (24%) |
Sweden  |
47 (15%) |
China  |
33 (11%) |
Germany  |
31 (10%) |
France  |
13 (4%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
13 (4%) |
Spain  |
13 (4%) |
Denmark  |
9 (3%) |
Russian Federation  |
5 (2%) |
Canada  |
5 (2%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
4 (1%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
4 (1%) |
Malaysia  |
4 (1%) |
New Zealand  |
4 (1%) |
Indonesia  |
4 (1%) |
Australia  |
3 (1%) |
Unknown  |
3 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
3 (1%) |
Brazil  |
3 (1%) |
Finland  |
2 (1%) |
South Africa  |
2 (1%) |
Lithuania  |
2 (1%) |
Israel  |
2 (1%) |
Poland  |
2 (1%) |
South Korea  |
2 (1%) |
Japan  |
2 (1%) |
Singapore  |
2 (1%) |
Albania  |
1 (0%) |
Viet Nam  |
1 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
1 (0%) |
Hungary  |
1 (0%) |
Portugal  |
1 (0%) |
India  |
1 (0%) |
Belarus  |
1 (0%) |
Faroe Islands  |
1 (0%) |
Pakistan  |
1 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory  |
1 (0%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
1 (0%) |
Mauritius  |
1 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
1 (0%) |
Philippines  |
1 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
1 (0%) |
Czechia  |
1 (0%) |
Serbia  |
1 (0%) |
Ukraine  |
1 (0%) |