LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Detecting clear-cut deforestation using Landsat data : a time series analysis of remote sensing data in Covasna County, Romania between 2005 and 2015
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2016
- Author/s
- Buhalau, Tudor
- Department/s
- Dept of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science
- In LUP since
- 2016-10-03
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 3622 | 281 | 10 |
United States of America  |
426 (12%) |
China  |
406 (11%) |
Finland  |
273 (8%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
201 (6%) |
Germany  |
182 (5%) |
Sweden  |
125 (3%) |
Romania  |
117 (3%) |
India  |
114 (3%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
112 (3%) |
Canada  |
82 (2%) |
Russian Federation  |
62 (2%) |
France  |
59 (2%) |
Italy  |
59 (2%) |
Bangladesh  |
56 (2%) |
Zimbabwe  |
53 (1%) |
Malaysia  |
51 (1%) |
Unknown  |
51 (1%) |
Spain  |
49 (1%) |
Indonesia  |
47 (1%) |
Brazil  |
46 (1%) |
Nigeria  |
44 (1%) |
Japan  |
35 (1%) |
Australia  |
35 (1%) |
Bulgaria  |
35 (1%) |
Norway  |
34 (1%) |
Portugal  |
32 (1%) |
South Africa  |
32 (1%) |
Peru  |
31 (1%) |
Morocco  |
30 (1%) |
Pakistan  |
30 (1%) |
Viet Nam  |
29 (1%) |
Czechia  |
29 (1%) |
Ethiopia  |
28 (1%) |
Thailand  |
27 (1%) |
Ukraine  |
26 (1%) |
Latvia  |
23 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
23 (1%) |
South Korea  |
22 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
20 (1%) |
Iran  |
18 (0%) |
Iraq  |
18 (0%) |
Austria  |
17 (0%) |
Mexico  |
17 (0%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
16 (0%) |
Poland  |
16 (0%) |
Uganda  |
15 (0%) |
Denmark  |
14 (0%) |
Greece  |
14 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
14 (0%) |
Colombia  |
14 (0%) |
Bolivia  |
14 (0%) |
Belgium  |
14 (0%) |
Philippines  |
13 (0%) |
Singapore  |
12 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire  |
12 (0%) |
Switzerland  |
11 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
11 (0%) |
Kenya  |
11 (0%) |
Israel  |
10 (0%) |
Argentina  |
10 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
10 (0%) |
Ireland  |
9 (0%) |
Suriname  |
9 (0%) |
Zambia  |
8 (0%) |
Ecuador  |
8 (0%) |
Estonia  |
7 (0%) |
Albania  |
7 (0%) |
Serbia  |
6 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
6 (0%) |
Cambodia  |
6 (0%) |
Myanmar  |
5 (0%) |
Fiji  |
5 (0%) |
Ghana  |
5 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
5 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
5 (0%) |
Algeria  |
4 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
4 (0%) |
Botswana  |
4 (0%) |
Chad  |
4 (0%) |
Azerbaijan  |
4 (0%) |
Mongolia  |
4 (0%) |
Chile  |
4 (0%) |
Madagascar  |
4 (0%) |
Jordan  |
3 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
3 (0%) |
Nepal  |
3 (0%) |
Cameroon  |
3 (0%) |
Mozambique  |
3 (0%) |
Sudan  |
3 (0%) |
Croatia  |
3 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
3 (0%) |
Hungary  |
2 (0%) |
Bhutan  |
2 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
2 (0%) |
Qatar  |
2 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
2 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
2 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
1 (0%) |
Uzbekistan  |
1 (0%) |
Angola  |
1 (0%) |
Armenia  |
1 (0%) |
Egypt  |
1 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
1 (0%) |
Venezuela  |
1 (0%) |
Congo  |
1 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
1 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic  |
1 (0%) |
Eritrea  |
1 (0%) |
Eswatini  |
1 (0%) |
Namibia  |
1 (0%) |
Congo  |
1 (0%) |
Honduras  |
1 (0%) |
Guyana  |
1 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
1 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
1 (0%) |
Togo  |
1 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
1 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
1 (0%) |
Somalia  |
1 (0%) |
Montenegro  |
1 (0%) |
Afghanistan  |
1 (0%) |
Seychelles  |
1 (0%) |
El Salvador  |
1 (0%) |