LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Detecting clear-cut deforestation using Landsat data : a time series analysis of remote sensing data in Covasna County, Romania between 2005 and 2015
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2016
- Author/s
- Buhalau, Tudor
- Department/s
- Dept of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science
- In LUP since
- 2016-10-03
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 2997 | 445 | 100 |
China  |
384 (13%) |
United States of America  |
275 (9%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
182 (6%) |
Finland  |
181 (6%) |
Germany  |
167 (6%) |
Sweden  |
122 (4%) |
India  |
113 (4%) |
Romania  |
103 (3%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
72 (2%) |
Canada  |
68 (2%) |
Russian Federation  |
57 (2%) |
Italy  |
55 (2%) |
Zimbabwe  |
53 (2%) |
France  |
49 (2%) |
Malaysia  |
48 (2%) |
Spain  |
48 (2%) |
Indonesia  |
45 (2%) |
Unknown  |
42 (1%) |
Brazil  |
40 (1%) |
Japan  |
34 (1%) |
Australia  |
34 (1%) |
Norway  |
31 (1%) |
Peru  |
30 (1%) |
Pakistan  |
28 (1%) |
Ethiopia  |
28 (1%) |
Viet Nam  |
26 (1%) |
Nigeria  |
25 (1%) |
Portugal  |
24 (1%) |
Morocco  |
23 (1%) |
Czechia  |
22 (1%) |
South Korea  |
22 (1%) |
South Africa  |
22 (1%) |
Bangladesh  |
22 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
21 (1%) |
Ukraine  |
20 (1%) |
Latvia  |
18 (1%) |
Iraq  |
17 (1%) |
Mexico  |
17 (1%) |
Iran  |
16 (1%) |
Austria  |
16 (1%) |
Bulgaria  |
15 (1%) |
Uganda  |
15 (1%) |
Colombia  |
14 (0%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
14 (0%) |
Greece  |
14 (0%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
14 (0%) |
Belgium  |
13 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
10 (0%) |
Argentina  |
10 (0%) |
Israel  |
10 (0%) |
Denmark  |
10 (0%) |
Philippines  |
10 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
10 (0%) |
Poland  |
9 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
9 (0%) |
Ireland  |
9 (0%) |
Singapore  |
9 (0%) |
Thailand  |
9 (0%) |
Kenya  |
9 (0%) |
Suriname  |
9 (0%) |
Zambia  |
8 (0%) |
Ecuador  |
8 (0%) |
Switzerland  |
8 (0%) |
Bolivia  |
7 (0%) |
Albania  |
7 (0%) |
Cambodia  |
6 (0%) |
Serbia  |
6 (0%) |
Estonia  |
5 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
5 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
5 (0%) |
Myanmar  |
5 (0%) |
Fiji  |
5 (0%) |
Botswana  |
4 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
4 (0%) |
Chile  |
4 (0%) |
Chad  |
4 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
4 (0%) |
Madagascar  |
4 (0%) |
Mongolia  |
4 (0%) |
Algeria  |
4 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire  |
4 (0%) |
Azerbaijan  |
4 (0%) |
Jordan  |
3 (0%) |
Ghana  |
3 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
3 (0%) |
Croatia  |
3 (0%) |
Sudan  |
3 (0%) |
Mozambique  |
3 (0%) |
Cameroon  |
3 (0%) |
Nepal  |
3 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
2 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
2 (0%) |
Bhutan  |
2 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
2 (0%) |
Hungary  |
2 (0%) |
Seychelles  |
1 (0%) |
Eswatini  |
1 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
1 (0%) |
El Salvador  |
1 (0%) |
Armenia  |
1 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
1 (0%) |
Angola  |
1 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
1 (0%) |
Eritrea  |
1 (0%) |
Guyana  |
1 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
1 (0%) |
Honduras  |
1 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
1 (0%) |
Somalia  |
1 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
1 (0%) |
Congo  |
1 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
1 (0%) |
Congo  |
1 (0%) |
Uzbekistan  |
1 (0%) |
Venezuela  |
1 (0%) |
Namibia  |
1 (0%) |
Montenegro  |
1 (0%) |
Afghanistan  |
1 (0%) |
Egypt  |
1 (0%) |