LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Enterprise Risk Management - The usage of COSO’s framework in recently publicly listed Swedish companies
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2016
- Author/s
- Klingvall, Fredrik; Ewerbring, Josephine
- Department/s
- Department of Business Administration
- In LUP since
- 2016-11-01
Downloads
Total | This Year | This Month |
2824 | 77 | 27 |
United States of America | 345 (12%) |
Sweden | 196 (7%) |
Philippines | 157 (6%) |
Netherlands | 132 (5%) |
Malaysia | 114 (4%) |
Thailand | 107 (4%) |
Indonesia | 107 (4%) |
Germany | 92 (3%) |
India | 87 (3%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 75 (3%) |
Unknown | 74 (3%) |
South Africa | 55 (2%) |
France | 53 (2%) |
Kenya | 46 (2%) |
Nigeria | 45 (2%) |
Australia | 41 (1%) |
Zimbabwe | 41 (1%) |
China | 39 (1%) |
Italy | 37 (1%) |
Canada | 32 (1%) |
Turkey | 30 (1%) |
Curacao | 29 (1%) |
United Arab Emirates | 28 (1%) |
Russian Federation | 28 (1%) |
Ghana | 27 (1%) |
Belgium | 27 (1%) |
Singapore | 27 (1%) |
Suriname | 26 (1%) |
Pakistan | 22 (1%) |
Peru | 22 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China) | 22 (1%) |
Botswana | 21 (1%) |
Egypt | 20 (1%) |
Ukraine | 20 (1%) |
Viet Nam | 19 (1%) |
Denmark | 19 (1%) |
Finland | 18 (1%) |
Czechia | 17 (1%) |
Morocco | 17 (1%) |
Sri Lanka | 16 (1%) |
Saudi Arabia | 15 (1%) |
Iran | 15 (1%) |
Greece | 14 (0%) |
Mexico | 13 (0%) |
Uganda | 13 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of | 13 (0%) |
Myanmar | 12 (0%) |
Qatar | 12 (0%) |
Jordan | 12 (0%) |
Norway | 12 (0%) |
Malawi | 11 (0%) |
Austria | 11 (0%) |
Ireland | 11 (0%) |
Brazil | 10 (0%) |
Oman | 10 (0%) |
Iraq | 10 (0%) |
Lebanon | 10 (0%) |
Switzerland | 10 (0%) |
Ethiopia | 9 (0%) |
Nepal | 9 (0%) |
Ecuador | 9 (0%) |
Algeria | 9 (0%) |
Portugal | 8 (0%) |
Zambia | 8 (0%) |
Lithuania | 8 (0%) |
Taiwan (China) | 8 (0%) |
Yemen | 7 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 7 (0%) |
Japan | 7 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago | 7 (0%) |
Mongolia | 6 (0%) |
Jamaica | 6 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory | 6 (0%) |
Spain | 6 (0%) |
Namibia | 6 (0%) |
Estonia | 5 (0%) |
Hungary | 5 (0%) |
Luxembourg | 5 (0%) |
South Korea | 5 (0%) |
Libya | 5 (0%) |
New Zealand | 5 (0%) |
Cambodia | 5 (0%) |
Bangladesh | 5 (0%) |
Romania | 5 (0%) |
Serbia | 4 (0%) |
Colombia | 4 (0%) |
Albania | 4 (0%) |
Cyprus | 4 (0%) |
Poland | 3 (0%) |
Chile | 3 (0%) |
El Salvador | 3 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic | 3 (0%) |
Costa Rica | 3 (0%) |
Slovenia | 3 (0%) |
Kazakhstan | 3 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic | 3 (0%) |
Georgia | 3 (0%) |
Rwanda | 3 (0%) |
Afghanistan | 3 (0%) |
Venezuela | 3 (0%) |
Honduras | 3 (0%) |
Azerbaijan | 3 (0%) |
Bulgaria | 3 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of | 2 (0%) |
Grenada | 2 (0%) |
Kuwait | 2 (0%) |
Mali | 2 (0%) |
Greenland | 2 (0%) |
Malta | 2 (0%) |
Bahrain | 2 (0%) |
Saint Lucia | 2 (0%) |
Slovakia | 2 (0%) |
Macao | 2 (0%) |
Maldives | 2 (0%) |
Tunisia | 2 (0%) |
Aruba | 2 (0%) |
Mauritius | 2 (0%) |
Argentina | 2 (0%) |
Bolivia | 1 (0%) |
Puerto Rico | 1 (0%) |
Iceland | 1 (0%) |
Latvia | 1 (0%) |
Guatemala | 1 (0%) |
Saint Kitts and Nevis | 1 (0%) |
Cameroon | 1 (0%) |
Sudan | 1 (0%) |
Cuba | 1 (0%) |
Senegal | 1 (0%) |
Belize | 1 (0%) |
Croatia | 1 (0%) |
Armenia | 1 (0%) |
Sierra Leone | 1 (0%) |
Panama | 1 (0%) |
Liberia | 1 (0%) |
Nicaragua | 1 (0%) |
Barbados | 1 (0%) |