LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- The hierarchy of Chinese grammar: A cross-sectional study of L2 Chinese within Processability Theory
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2017
- Author/s
- Brolin, Magnus
- Department/s
- Master's Programme: Language and Linguistics
- In LUP since
- 2017-11-17
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 1362 | 17 | 3 |
United States of America  |
237 (17%) |
Sweden  |
121 (9%) |
China  |
78 (6%) |
Unknown  |
48 (4%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
47 (3%) |
Singapore  |
44 (3%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
40 (3%) |
Russian Federation  |
36 (3%) |
Italy  |
36 (3%) |
Australia  |
29 (2%) |
Germany  |
29 (2%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
28 (2%) |
Thailand  |
27 (2%) |
Japan  |
26 (2%) |
Canada  |
25 (2%) |
Malaysia  |
24 (2%) |
South Korea  |
24 (2%) |
Viet Nam  |
23 (2%) |
India  |
23 (2%) |
Indonesia  |
23 (2%) |
Sri Lanka  |
20 (1%) |
Brazil  |
20 (1%) |
Egypt  |
18 (1%) |
Nigeria  |
14 (1%) |
France  |
14 (1%) |
Spain  |
14 (1%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
14 (1%) |
Cambodia  |
13 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
13 (1%) |
Mexico  |
13 (1%) |
Ethiopia  |
11 (1%) |
Ukraine  |
10 (1%) |
Pakistan  |
10 (1%) |
Iran  |
9 (1%) |
Denmark  |
8 (1%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
8 (1%) |
Philippines  |
8 (1%) |
Colombia  |
7 (1%) |
Poland  |
7 (1%) |
South Africa  |
6 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
6 (0%) |
Belgium  |
5 (0%) |
Kenya  |
5 (0%) |
Peru  |
5 (0%) |
Morocco  |
5 (0%) |
Bangladesh  |
5 (0%) |
Nepal  |
5 (0%) |
Czechia  |
5 (0%) |
Romania  |
5 (0%) |
Norway  |
4 (0%) |
Hungary  |
4 (0%) |
Greece  |
4 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
4 (0%) |
Sudan  |
3 (0%) |
Argentina  |
3 (0%) |
Macao  |
3 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
3 (0%) |
Botswana  |
3 (0%) |
Zimbabwe  |
3 (0%) |
Austria  |
3 (0%) |
Israel  |
3 (0%) |
Chile  |
3 (0%) |
Myanmar  |
3 (0%) |
Madagascar  |
2 (0%) |
Senegal  |
2 (0%) |
Ireland  |
2 (0%) |
Uganda  |
2 (0%) |
Cyprus  |
2 (0%) |
Uruguay  |
2 (0%) |
Ecuador  |
2 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
2 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
2 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
2 (0%) |
Finland  |
2 (0%) |
Algeria  |
2 (0%) |
Yemen  |
2 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
2 (0%) |
Angola  |
2 (0%) |
Qatar  |
2 (0%) |
Uzbekistan  |
2 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
2 (0%) |
Turkmenistan  |
2 (0%) |
Switzerland  |
2 (0%) |
Niger  |
1 (0%) |
Iceland  |
1 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
1 (0%) |
Latvia  |
1 (0%) |
Togo  |
1 (0%) |
Belarus  |
1 (0%) |
Portugal  |
1 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
1 (0%) |
El Salvador  |
1 (0%) |
Suriname  |
1 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire  |
1 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
1 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
1 (0%) |
Costa Rica  |
1 (0%) |
Georgia  |
1 (0%) |
Mongolia  |
1 (0%) |
Somalia  |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
1 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic  |
1 (0%) |
Zambia  |
1 (0%) |
Venezuela  |
1 (0%) |
Jordan  |
1 (0%) |