LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- What determines the differences in idiosyncratic volatility between Swedish firms and comparable European firms?
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2018
- Author/s
- Swanson, Jesper; Lindberg, Linus
- Department/s
- Department of Economics
- In LUP since
- 2018-07-03
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 411 | 1 | 0 |
Sweden  |
90 (22%) |
United States of America  |
64 (16%) |
Germany  |
32 (8%) |
Indonesia  |
22 (5%) |
China  |
21 (5%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
20 (5%) |
India  |
14 (3%) |
Turkiye  |
12 (3%) |
France  |
10 (2%) |
Pakistan  |
10 (2%) |
Brazil  |
9 (2%) |
Malaysia  |
7 (2%) |
New Zealand  |
6 (1%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
6 (1%) |
Spain  |
5 (1%) |
Iran  |
5 (1%) |
Czechia  |
5 (1%) |
Russian Federation  |
4 (1%) |
Kenya  |
4 (1%) |
South Korea  |
4 (1%) |
Finland  |
4 (1%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
4 (1%) |
Denmark  |
4 (1%) |
Unknown  |
4 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
3 (1%) |
Belgium  |
3 (1%) |
Viet Nam  |
3 (1%) |
Greece  |
3 (1%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
2 (0%) |
Portugal  |
2 (0%) |
Singapore  |
2 (0%) |
Canada  |
2 (0%) |
Australia  |
2 (0%) |
Japan  |
2 (0%) |
Italy  |
2 (0%) |
Jordan  |
2 (0%) |
Egypt  |
2 (0%) |
South Africa  |
2 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
2 (0%) |
Austria  |
2 (0%) |
Switzerland  |
2 (0%) |
Croatia  |
1 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
1 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
1 (0%) |
Serbia  |
1 (0%) |
Romania  |
1 (0%) |
Norway  |
1 (0%) |
Mexico  |
1 (0%) |