Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The variability in ultrafiltration achieved with icodextrin, possibly explained.

Venturoli, Daniele LU ; Jeloka, Tarun K ; Ersoy, Fevzi F ; Rippe, Bengt LU and Oreopoulos, Dimitrios G (2009) In Peritoneal Dialysis International 29(4). p.415-421
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A recent study by Jeloka et al. (Perit Dial Int 2006; 26:336-40) highlighted the high variability in maximum ultrafiltered volume (UF(max)) and the corresponding dwell time (t(max)) obtained using 7.5% icodextrin solution. We aimed to pinpoint the possible sources of this phenomenon by simulating the icodextrin ultrafiltration (UF) profiles according to the three-pore model of peritoneal transport. Method: The individual UF time courses observed in the study by Jeloka et al. (n = 29) were first characterized by linear and quadratic regression. We were then able to identify four main patterns. These were then adapted to UF profiles generated by the three-pore model by systematically altering the values of some model parameters,... (More)
BACKGROUND: A recent study by Jeloka et al. (Perit Dial Int 2006; 26:336-40) highlighted the high variability in maximum ultrafiltered volume (UF(max)) and the corresponding dwell time (t(max)) obtained using 7.5% icodextrin solution. We aimed to pinpoint the possible sources of this phenomenon by simulating the icodextrin ultrafiltration (UF) profiles according to the three-pore model of peritoneal transport. Method: The individual UF time courses observed in the study by Jeloka et al. (n = 29) were first characterized by linear and quadratic regression. We were then able to identify four main patterns. These were then adapted to UF profiles generated by the three-pore model by systematically altering the values of some model parameters, namely, the mass transfer area coefficient (MTAC or PS) for icodextrin/glucose, the peritoneal UF coefficient (LpS), the plasma colloid osmotic pressure gradient (DeltaPi), and the macromolecular clearance out of the peritoneal cavity (Cl(LF)). RESULTS: Modifications in the PS values caused only marginal variations in UF(max) and t(max), while more significant changes were produced by altering LpS and Cl(LF). However, far more evident was the importance of changes in DeltaPi. In fact, lowering DeltaPi to 14 mmHg caused a steady increase in UF with 10 - 14 hour dwells. On the contrary, the UF profiles became nearly "flat" when DeltaPi was increased to 30 mmHg. The parallel shifts induced by altering icodextrin metabolite concentrations did not markedly influence UF(max) or t(max). CONCLUSION: The UF pattern in icodextrin dwells seem to be mainly determined by the plasma colloid osmotic pressure, while only moderate changes can be seen with alterations in LpS and Cl(LF). The result is not completely unexpected considering that icodextrin acts by inducing a strong colloid osmotic gradient. A number of clinical studies would be needed, however, in order to prove this hypothesis. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Peritoneal Dialysis International
volume
29
issue
4
pages
415 - 421
publisher
Multimed Inc.
external identifiers
  • wos:000267981900008
  • pmid:19602607
  • scopus:70349498731
ISSN
1718-4304
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
38cbfa34-c1d3-4bbe-a3f7-f15515cfff76 (old id 1453087)
alternative location
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19602607?dopt=Abstract
date added to LUP
2016-04-04 09:24:15
date last changed
2022-01-29 17:43:53
@article{38cbfa34-c1d3-4bbe-a3f7-f15515cfff76,
  abstract     = {{BACKGROUND: A recent study by Jeloka et al. (Perit Dial Int 2006; 26:336-40) highlighted the high variability in maximum ultrafiltered volume (UF(max)) and the corresponding dwell time (t(max)) obtained using 7.5% icodextrin solution. We aimed to pinpoint the possible sources of this phenomenon by simulating the icodextrin ultrafiltration (UF) profiles according to the three-pore model of peritoneal transport. Method: The individual UF time courses observed in the study by Jeloka et al. (n = 29) were first characterized by linear and quadratic regression. We were then able to identify four main patterns. These were then adapted to UF profiles generated by the three-pore model by systematically altering the values of some model parameters, namely, the mass transfer area coefficient (MTAC or PS) for icodextrin/glucose, the peritoneal UF coefficient (LpS), the plasma colloid osmotic pressure gradient (DeltaPi), and the macromolecular clearance out of the peritoneal cavity (Cl(LF)). RESULTS: Modifications in the PS values caused only marginal variations in UF(max) and t(max), while more significant changes were produced by altering LpS and Cl(LF). However, far more evident was the importance of changes in DeltaPi. In fact, lowering DeltaPi to 14 mmHg caused a steady increase in UF with 10 - 14 hour dwells. On the contrary, the UF profiles became nearly "flat" when DeltaPi was increased to 30 mmHg. The parallel shifts induced by altering icodextrin metabolite concentrations did not markedly influence UF(max) or t(max). CONCLUSION: The UF pattern in icodextrin dwells seem to be mainly determined by the plasma colloid osmotic pressure, while only moderate changes can be seen with alterations in LpS and Cl(LF). The result is not completely unexpected considering that icodextrin acts by inducing a strong colloid osmotic gradient. A number of clinical studies would be needed, however, in order to prove this hypothesis.}},
  author       = {{Venturoli, Daniele and Jeloka, Tarun K and Ersoy, Fevzi F and Rippe, Bengt and Oreopoulos, Dimitrios G}},
  issn         = {{1718-4304}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{415--421}},
  publisher    = {{Multimed Inc.}},
  series       = {{Peritoneal Dialysis International}},
  title        = {{The variability in ultrafiltration achieved with icodextrin, possibly explained.}},
  url          = {{http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19602607?dopt=Abstract}},
  volume       = {{29}},
  year         = {{2009}},
}