Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Estrogens and phytoestrogens in male infertility.

Giwercman, Aleksander LU (2011) In Current Opinion in Urology 21(6). p.519-526
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A time-related negative trend in male reproductive function has been suggested. It has been hypothesized that this is due to exposure to chemicals interfering with the action of sex hormones. Also a negative effect of phytoestrogens on male fertility has been postulated. This review aimed to review the epidemiological evidence of deteriorating male reproductive function and summarize the most recent literature on exposure to endocrine disrupters and phytoestrogens in relation to male fertility and/or semen quality. RECENT FINDINGS: There is no doubt that the incidence of testicular cancer has increased through the past 50 years, a decline in sperm counts, if any, may have leveled off during the past decade. There are... (More)
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A time-related negative trend in male reproductive function has been suggested. It has been hypothesized that this is due to exposure to chemicals interfering with the action of sex hormones. Also a negative effect of phytoestrogens on male fertility has been postulated. This review aimed to review the epidemiological evidence of deteriorating male reproductive function and summarize the most recent literature on exposure to endocrine disrupters and phytoestrogens in relation to male fertility and/or semen quality. RECENT FINDINGS: There is no doubt that the incidence of testicular cancer has increased through the past 50 years, a decline in sperm counts, if any, may have leveled off during the past decade. There are some reports indicating negative association between exposure to certain chemicals and sperm parameters such evidence has not been found for phytoestrogens. The majority of these studies have been limited to assessing postnatal exposure. SUMMARY: Although possible negative impact of industrial chemicals and male fertility is an important issue on the research agenda, so far, it has no clinical implications. The future research should focus on looking at the impact of low dose exposure to a mixture of chemicals, two generation studies and gene-environment interaction. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Current Opinion in Urology
volume
21
issue
6
pages
519 - 526
publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
external identifiers
  • wos:000295848000014
  • pmid:21941185
  • scopus:80053959764
  • pmid:21941185
ISSN
0963-0643
DOI
10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834b7e7c
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
a4423c88-0af6-43a0-ba9a-836aa1030688 (old id 2168644)
alternative location
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21941185?dopt=Abstract
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 10:32:15
date last changed
2022-05-17 23:51:33
@article{a4423c88-0af6-43a0-ba9a-836aa1030688,
  abstract     = {{PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A time-related negative trend in male reproductive function has been suggested. It has been hypothesized that this is due to exposure to chemicals interfering with the action of sex hormones. Also a negative effect of phytoestrogens on male fertility has been postulated. This review aimed to review the epidemiological evidence of deteriorating male reproductive function and summarize the most recent literature on exposure to endocrine disrupters and phytoestrogens in relation to male fertility and/or semen quality. RECENT FINDINGS: There is no doubt that the incidence of testicular cancer has increased through the past 50 years, a decline in sperm counts, if any, may have leveled off during the past decade. There are some reports indicating negative association between exposure to certain chemicals and sperm parameters such evidence has not been found for phytoestrogens. The majority of these studies have been limited to assessing postnatal exposure. SUMMARY: Although possible negative impact of industrial chemicals and male fertility is an important issue on the research agenda, so far, it has no clinical implications. The future research should focus on looking at the impact of low dose exposure to a mixture of chemicals, two generation studies and gene-environment interaction.}},
  author       = {{Giwercman, Aleksander}},
  issn         = {{0963-0643}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{519--526}},
  publisher    = {{Lippincott Williams & Wilkins}},
  series       = {{Current Opinion in Urology}},
  title        = {{Estrogens and phytoestrogens in male infertility.}},
  url          = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/1926597/2835049.pdf}},
  doi          = {{10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834b7e7c}},
  volume       = {{21}},
  year         = {{2011}},
}