Comparison of methods for soil microbial-population and biomass studies
(1979) In Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde 142(3). p.520-533- Abstract
- A comparison was made of 15 different techniques which are used in assessing soil microbial populations and/or biomasses. These include direct observations (fungal standing crop, fluorescein diacetate active mycelia, acridine orange stained bacteria), cultural methods (bacterial plate counts), physiological methods (total microbial, bacterial and fungal biomasses, O2-uptake), soil enzyme analyses (dehydrogenase, catalase, alkaline and acid phosphatase, protease, amylase), and ATP-analyses.
The various techniques were applied to six soils known to have different microbial characteristics. The results are discussed with respect to the convertability of counts and measurements into microbial biomasses, the variability of... (More) - A comparison was made of 15 different techniques which are used in assessing soil microbial populations and/or biomasses. These include direct observations (fungal standing crop, fluorescein diacetate active mycelia, acridine orange stained bacteria), cultural methods (bacterial plate counts), physiological methods (total microbial, bacterial and fungal biomasses, O2-uptake), soil enzyme analyses (dehydrogenase, catalase, alkaline and acid phosphatase, protease, amylase), and ATP-analyses.
The various techniques were applied to six soils known to have different microbial characteristics. The results are discussed with respect to the convertability of counts and measurements into microbial biomasses, the variability of the techniques, the correlations within comparable groups of methods, and the practical limitations in application of individual methods to different soils. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/2226554
- author
- Domsch, K.H., ; Beck, T., ; Anderson, J.P.E., ; Söderström, Bengt LU ; Parkinson, D., and Trolldenier, G.
- organization
- publishing date
- 1979
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde
- volume
- 142
- issue
- 3
- pages
- 520 - 533
- publisher
- John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:84981375064
- ISSN
- 0044-3263
- DOI
- 10.1002/jpln.19791420322
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 4e6f0547-c3ed-4b7c-ade3-4dbe83d79541 (old id 2226554)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 16:18:50
- date last changed
- 2021-04-04 06:19:45
@article{4e6f0547-c3ed-4b7c-ade3-4dbe83d79541,
abstract = {{A comparison was made of 15 different techniques which are used in assessing soil microbial populations and/or biomasses. These include direct observations (fungal standing crop, fluorescein diacetate active mycelia, acridine orange stained bacteria), cultural methods (bacterial plate counts), physiological methods (total microbial, bacterial and fungal biomasses, O2-uptake), soil enzyme analyses (dehydrogenase, catalase, alkaline and acid phosphatase, protease, amylase), and ATP-analyses.<br/><br>
<br/><br>
The various techniques were applied to six soils known to have different microbial characteristics. The results are discussed with respect to the convertability of counts and measurements into microbial biomasses, the variability of the techniques, the correlations within comparable groups of methods, and the practical limitations in application of individual methods to different soils.}},
author = {{Domsch, K.H., and Beck, T., and Anderson, J.P.E., and Söderström, Bengt and Parkinson, D., and Trolldenier, G.}},
issn = {{0044-3263}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{3}},
pages = {{520--533}},
publisher = {{John Wiley & Sons Inc.}},
series = {{Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde}},
title = {{Comparison of methods for soil microbial-population and biomass studies}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jpln.19791420322}},
doi = {{10.1002/jpln.19791420322}},
volume = {{142}},
year = {{1979}},
}