Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

New Directions in Judicial Review? Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Impact Assessment in the Tobacco Product Directive Case

Nowag, Julian LU and Groussot, Xavier LU (2017) p.83-101
Abstract
In this essay in honour of Christina Moëll, we focus on one particular recent case: the Philip Morris case delivered in May 2016 where the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rules on the validity of the Tobacco Product Directive case.1 It is a key case on the application of the principle of proportionality but not only since it connects this principle with other constitutional principles putting limits to the regulatory action such as fundamental rights and the principle of subsidiarity. This case constitutes a
perfect illustration of ‘administrative constitutionalism’, a doctrine which encapsulates the academic work of Christina Moëll in a nutshell.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Proportionality principle, Subsidiarity, Impact assessment, EU law, Proportionalitetsprincipen, EU-rätt
host publication
Festskrift till Christina Moell
editor
Tjernberg, Mats ; Rendahl, Pernilla and Wenander, Henrik
pages
83 - 101
publisher
Juristförlaget i Lund
ISBN
9789154405725
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
2cc4e8cf-a4f2-4027-9f8d-549c7d210c72
date added to LUP
2018-02-23 14:49:45
date last changed
2022-02-24 13:01:23
@inbook{2cc4e8cf-a4f2-4027-9f8d-549c7d210c72,
  abstract     = {{In this essay in honour of Christina Moëll, we focus on one particular recent case: the Philip Morris case delivered in May 2016 where the European Court of Justice (ECJ) rules on the validity of the Tobacco Product Directive case.1 It is a key case on the application of the principle of proportionality but not only since it connects this principle with other constitutional principles putting limits to the regulatory action such as fundamental rights and the principle of subsidiarity. This case constitutes a<br/>perfect illustration of ‘administrative constitutionalism’, a doctrine which encapsulates the academic work of Christina Moëll in a nutshell.}},
  author       = {{Nowag, Julian and Groussot, Xavier}},
  booktitle    = {{Festskrift till Christina Moell}},
  editor       = {{Tjernberg, Mats and Rendahl, Pernilla and Wenander, Henrik}},
  isbn         = {{9789154405725}},
  keywords     = {{Proportionality principle; Subsidiarity; Impact assessment; EU law; Proportionalitetsprincipen; EU-rätt}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{83--101}},
  publisher    = {{Juristförlaget i Lund}},
  title        = {{New Directions in Judicial Review? Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Impact Assessment in the Tobacco Product Directive Case}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}