Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics.
Antfolk, Christian LU ; D'Alonzo, Marco ; Rosén, Birgitta LU ; Lundborg, Göran LU ; Sebelius, Fredrik LU
and Cipriani, Christian
(2013)
In Expert Review of Medical Devices
10(1).
p.45-54
- Abstract
- One of the challenges facing prosthetic designers and engineers is to restore the missing sensory function inherit to hand amputation. Several different techniques can be employed to provide amputees with sensory feedback: sensory substitution methods where the recorded stimulus is not only transferred to the amputee, but also translated to a different modality (modality-matched feedback), which transfers the stimulus without translation and direct neural stimulation, which interacts directly with peripheral afferent nerves. This paper presents an overview of the principal works and devices employed to provide upper limb amputees with sensory feedback. The focus is on sensory substitution and modality matched feedback; the principal... (More)
- One of the challenges facing prosthetic designers and engineers is to restore the missing sensory function inherit to hand amputation. Several different techniques can be employed to provide amputees with sensory feedback: sensory substitution methods where the recorded stimulus is not only transferred to the amputee, but also translated to a different modality (modality-matched feedback), which transfers the stimulus without translation and direct neural stimulation, which interacts directly with peripheral afferent nerves. This paper presents an overview of the principal works and devices employed to provide upper limb amputees with sensory feedback. The focus is on sensory substitution and modality matched feedback; the principal features, advantages and disadvantages of the different methods are presented. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/3439091
- author
- Antfolk, Christian
LU
; D'Alonzo, Marco
; Rosén, Birgitta
LU
; Lundborg, Göran
LU
; Sebelius, Fredrik
LU
and Cipriani, Christian
- organization
- publishing date
- 2013
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Expert Review of Medical Devices
- volume
- 10
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 45 - 54
- publisher
- Expert Reviews
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000316068000012
- pmid:23278223
- scopus:84871951414
- pmid:23278223
- ISSN
- 1745-2422
- DOI
- 10.1586/erd.12.68
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 0ba72fad-5402-45a3-8203-9618586283d9 (old id 3439091)
- alternative location
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23278223?dopt=Abstract
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 10:17:15
- date last changed
- 2022-05-17 21:36:49
@article{0ba72fad-5402-45a3-8203-9618586283d9,
abstract = {{One of the challenges facing prosthetic designers and engineers is to restore the missing sensory function inherit to hand amputation. Several different techniques can be employed to provide amputees with sensory feedback: sensory substitution methods where the recorded stimulus is not only transferred to the amputee, but also translated to a different modality (modality-matched feedback), which transfers the stimulus without translation and direct neural stimulation, which interacts directly with peripheral afferent nerves. This paper presents an overview of the principal works and devices employed to provide upper limb amputees with sensory feedback. The focus is on sensory substitution and modality matched feedback; the principal features, advantages and disadvantages of the different methods are presented.}},
author = {{Antfolk, Christian and D'Alonzo, Marco and Rosén, Birgitta and Lundborg, Göran and Sebelius, Fredrik and Cipriani, Christian}},
issn = {{1745-2422}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{45--54}},
publisher = {{Expert Reviews}},
series = {{Expert Review of Medical Devices}},
title = {{Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics.}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/erd.12.68}},
doi = {{10.1586/erd.12.68}},
volume = {{10}},
year = {{2013}},
}