Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

On the methodologies for the assessment of the impact of parameters in acoustophoretic separation devices

Garofalo, Fabio LU (2019) In Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 23(7).
Abstract

In this communication, we reconcile the kinematic method illustrated by some authors (Yang et al. in Microfluid Nanofluid 22:44–56, 2018; Vitali et al. in RSC Adv 8:38955, 2018) in studying the impact of system and suspension parameters on acoustophoretic separations with the statistical method formerly proposed by Garofalo (Microfluid Nanofluid 18(3):367–382, 2014a; ASME 2014 3rd global congress on nanoengineering for medicine and biology NEMB2014-93092, 2014b. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259962346_Free-flow_acoustofluidic_devices_kinematics_cross-sectional_dispersion_and_particle_ensemble_correlations_Presentation) and lately extended to particle populations by the same author (Garofalo in CBMS the 14th conference on... (More)

In this communication, we reconcile the kinematic method illustrated by some authors (Yang et al. in Microfluid Nanofluid 22:44–56, 2018; Vitali et al. in RSC Adv 8:38955, 2018) in studying the impact of system and suspension parameters on acoustophoretic separations with the statistical method formerly proposed by Garofalo (Microfluid Nanofluid 18(3):367–382, 2014a; ASME 2014 3rd global congress on nanoengineering for medicine and biology NEMB2014-93092, 2014b. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259962346_Free-flow_acoustofluidic_devices_kinematics_cross-sectional_dispersion_and_particle_ensemble_correlations_Presentation) and lately extended to particle populations by the same author (Garofalo in CBMS the 14th conference on acoustofluidics, San Diego (CA), August 28–29, 2017, 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259962346_Free-flow_acoustofluidic_devices_kinematics_cross-sectional_dispersion_and_particle_ensemble_correlations_Presentation; Quantifying acoustophoretic separation of microparticle populations by mean-and-covariance dynamics for Gaussians in mixture models, 2018. arXiv:1802.09790). The connection between these two methods is established by (1) reinterpreting the kinematic method in terms of tangent space dynamics, and (2) transforming the dynamics in the tangent space into the dynamics of the area elements. The dynamics of the area elements is equivalent to the dynamics of the covariance matrix derived by moment analysis and associated with the dispersion problem during microparticle acoustophoresis. The similarities and the differences between the kinematic based method and the stochastic method proposed by the present author are illustrated and discussed in the light of the numerical results for a prototypical model of acoustophoretic separation.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Acoustic standing waves, Acoustofluidics, Particle separation
in
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics
volume
23
issue
7
article number
90
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • scopus:85067247475
ISSN
1613-4982
DOI
10.1007/s10404-019-2250-x
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
3bc8ed1e-caac-46b5-a085-711a35f70601
date added to LUP
2019-06-26 13:32:40
date last changed
2022-03-18 02:32:48
@article{3bc8ed1e-caac-46b5-a085-711a35f70601,
  abstract     = {{<p>In this communication, we reconcile the kinematic method illustrated by some authors (Yang et al. in Microfluid Nanofluid 22:44–56, 2018; Vitali et al. in RSC Adv 8:38955, 2018) in studying the impact of system and suspension parameters on acoustophoretic separations with the statistical method formerly proposed by Garofalo (Microfluid Nanofluid 18(3):367–382, 2014a; ASME 2014 3rd global congress on nanoengineering for medicine and biology NEMB2014-93092, 2014b. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259962346_Free-flow_acoustofluidic_devices_kinematics_cross-sectional_dispersion_and_particle_ensemble_correlations_Presentation) and lately extended to particle populations by the same author (Garofalo in CBMS the 14th conference on acoustofluidics, San Diego (CA), August 28–29, 2017, 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259962346_Free-flow_acoustofluidic_devices_kinematics_cross-sectional_dispersion_and_particle_ensemble_correlations_Presentation; Quantifying acoustophoretic separation of microparticle populations by mean-and-covariance dynamics for Gaussians in mixture models, 2018. arXiv:1802.09790). The connection between these two methods is established by (1) reinterpreting the kinematic method in terms of tangent space dynamics, and (2) transforming the dynamics in the tangent space into the dynamics of the area elements. The dynamics of the area elements is equivalent to the dynamics of the covariance matrix derived by moment analysis and associated with the dispersion problem during microparticle acoustophoresis. The similarities and the differences between the kinematic based method and the stochastic method proposed by the present author are illustrated and discussed in the light of the numerical results for a prototypical model of acoustophoretic separation.</p>}},
  author       = {{Garofalo, Fabio}},
  issn         = {{1613-4982}},
  keywords     = {{Acoustic standing waves; Acoustofluidics; Particle separation}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{7}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Microfluidics and Nanofluidics}},
  title        = {{On the methodologies for the assessment of the impact of parameters in acoustophoretic separation devices}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10404-019-2250-x}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s10404-019-2250-x}},
  volume       = {{23}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}