Crime Victims and the Right to Punishment
(2019) In Criminal Law and Philosophy 13(1). p.63-81- Abstract
- In this paper, I consider the question of whether crime victims can be said to have a moral right to see their victimizers punished (a “right to punishment”) that could explain why they often feel wronged or cheated when the state fails to punish offenders (or even to make such conduct punishable). In the first part, I explain what I mean by a “right to punishment” and what it is for such a right to “explain” the frustrated crime victim’s reaction. In the second part, I distinguish such a right from a Lockean-style right to punish, which is also shown incapable of providing the needed explanation. In the third part I argue that it is difficult to identify any benefit such that the right to punishment could plausibly be understood as a... (More)
- In this paper, I consider the question of whether crime victims can be said to have a moral right to see their victimizers punished (a “right to punishment”) that could explain why they often feel wronged or cheated when the state fails to punish offenders (or even to make such conduct punishable). In the first part, I explain what I mean by a “right to punishment” and what it is for such a right to “explain” the frustrated crime victim’s reaction. In the second part, I distinguish such a right from a Lockean-style right to punish, which is also shown incapable of providing the needed explanation. In the third part I argue that it is difficult to identify any benefit such that the right to punishment could plausibly be understood as a right to that benefit. I discuss two main candidates here: (i) the vaguely Hegelian idea that punishment is itself some sort of restitution for the wrong done to the victim; and (ii) the idea, due to Victor Tadros, that punishment is a form of compensation for wrongdoing by contributing indirectly to protecting victims from future harm. In the final section, I suggest instead that the frustrated crime victim’s reaction, when justified, is best explained, not by the violation of any right to punishment, but rather by the state’s failure to treat the victim as an equal. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/58295357-09e8-4c1e-bcdb-df5f73410b65
- author
- Alm, David LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2019
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Criminal Law and Philosophy
- volume
- 13
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 63 - 81
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85046026000
- ISSN
- 1871-9805
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11572-018-9459-8
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 58295357-09e8-4c1e-bcdb-df5f73410b65
- date added to LUP
- 2018-03-15 09:53:53
- date last changed
- 2022-04-25 06:16:11
@article{58295357-09e8-4c1e-bcdb-df5f73410b65,
abstract = {{In this paper, I consider the question of whether crime victims can be said to have a moral right to see their victimizers punished (a “right to punishment”) that could explain why they often feel wronged or cheated when the state fails to punish offenders (or even to make such conduct punishable). In the first part, I explain what I mean by a “right to punishment” and what it is for such a right to “explain” the frustrated crime victim’s reaction. In the second part, I distinguish such a right from a Lockean-style right to punish, which is also shown incapable of providing the needed explanation. In the third part I argue that it is difficult to identify any benefit such that the right to punishment could plausibly be understood as a right to that benefit. I discuss two main candidates here: (i) the vaguely Hegelian idea that punishment is itself some sort of restitution for the wrong done to the victim; and (ii) the idea, due to Victor Tadros, that punishment is a form of compensation for wrongdoing by contributing indirectly to protecting victims from future harm. In the final section, I suggest instead that the frustrated crime victim’s reaction, when justified, is best explained, not by the violation of any right to punishment, but rather by the state’s failure to treat the victim as an equal.}},
author = {{Alm, David}},
issn = {{1871-9805}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{63--81}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Criminal Law and Philosophy}},
title = {{Crime Victims and the Right to Punishment}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11572-018-9459-8}},
doi = {{10.1007/s11572-018-9459-8}},
volume = {{13}},
year = {{2019}},
}