Iceland Should Replace Its Central Bank with a Currency Board.
(2019) p.349-349- Abstract
- In this contribution, we discuss the menu of policy regimes available for Iceland. Each regime is evaluated against the characteristics of the Icelandic economy. We start with a short description of the Icelandic economy. We then examine the costs and benefts of alternative monetary regimes. We conclude that no regime Iceland has tried since attaining full sovereignty in 1918 has provided economic and financial stability in the long run. We reach the conclusion that Iceland
should follow the example of some other small economies and microstates and settle on a currency board, in this case with the euro as the anchor currency. To ensure the sustainability of the currency board, we recommend additional reforms of the labour market and of... (More) - In this contribution, we discuss the menu of policy regimes available for Iceland. Each regime is evaluated against the characteristics of the Icelandic economy. We start with a short description of the Icelandic economy. We then examine the costs and benefts of alternative monetary regimes. We conclude that no regime Iceland has tried since attaining full sovereignty in 1918 has provided economic and financial stability in the long run. We reach the conclusion that Iceland
should follow the example of some other small economies and microstates and settle on a currency board, in this case with the euro as the anchor currency. To ensure the sustainability of the currency board, we recommend additional reforms of the labour market and of the fiscal framework of Iceland. (Less) - Abstract (Swedish)
- In this contribution, we discuss the menu of policy regimes available for Iceland. Each regime is evaluated against the characteristics of the Icelandic economy. We start with a short description of the Icelandic economy. We then examine the costs and benefts of alternative monetary regimes. We conclude that no regime Iceland has tried since attaining full sovereignty in 1918 has provided economic and financial stability in the long run. We reach the conclusion that Iceland should follow the example of some other small economies and microstates and settle on a currency board, in this case with the euro as the anchor currency. To ensure the sustainability of the currency board, we recommend additional reforms of the labour market and of the... (More)
- In this contribution, we discuss the menu of policy regimes available for Iceland. Each regime is evaluated against the characteristics of the Icelandic economy. We start with a short description of the Icelandic economy. We then examine the costs and benefts of alternative monetary regimes. We conclude that no regime Iceland has tried since attaining full sovereignty in 1918 has provided economic and financial stability in the long run. We reach the conclusion that Iceland should follow the example of some other small economies and microstates and settle on a currency board, in this case with the euro as the anchor currency. To ensure the sustainability of the currency board, we recommend additional reforms of the labour market and of the fiscal framework of Iceland. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/5904b3fd-84eb-492b-90f5-c54d73560bf4
- author
- Andersson, Fredrik N G LU and Jonung, Lars LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2019-06-10
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- iceland, monetary policy, currency board, Financial Crisis, iceland, monetary policy, currency board, finacial crisis
- host publication
- The 2008 Global Financial Crisis in Retrospect. : Causes of the Crisis and National Regulatory Responses - Causes of the Crisis and National Regulatory Responses
- editor
- Aliber, Robert Z. and Zoega, Gylfi
- pages
- 369 pages
- publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85084429058
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 5904b3fd-84eb-492b-90f5-c54d73560bf4
- alternative location
- https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-12395-6
- https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-030-12395-6_18.pdf
- date added to LUP
- 2019-06-14 09:11:12
- date last changed
- 2023-03-19 04:04:23
@inbook{5904b3fd-84eb-492b-90f5-c54d73560bf4,
abstract = {{In this contribution, we discuss the menu of policy regimes available for Iceland. Each regime is evaluated against the characteristics of the Icelandic economy. We start with a short description of the Icelandic economy. We then examine the costs and benefts of alternative monetary regimes. We conclude that no regime Iceland has tried since attaining full sovereignty in 1918 has provided economic and financial stability in the long run. We reach the conclusion that Iceland<br/>should follow the example of some other small economies and microstates and settle on a currency board, in this case with the euro as the anchor currency. To ensure the sustainability of the currency board, we recommend additional reforms of the labour market and of the fiscal framework of Iceland.}},
author = {{Andersson, Fredrik N G and Jonung, Lars}},
booktitle = {{The 2008 Global Financial Crisis in Retrospect. : Causes of the Crisis and National Regulatory Responses}},
editor = {{Aliber, Robert Z. and Zoega, Gylfi}},
keywords = {{iceland; monetary policy; currency board; Financial Crisis; iceland; monetary policy; currency board; finacial crisis}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{06}},
pages = {{349--349}},
publisher = {{Palgrave Macmillan}},
title = {{Iceland Should Replace Its Central Bank with a Currency Board.}},
url = {{https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-12395-6}},
year = {{2019}},
}