Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Defence versus defence : Are crucian carp trading off immune function against predator-induced morphology?

Vinterstare, Jerker LU orcid ; Hegemann, Arne LU ; Nilsson, Per Anders LU orcid ; Hulthén, Kaj LU and Brönmark, Christer LU (2019) In Journal of Animal Ecology 88(10). p.1510-1521
Abstract

Numerous species adopt inducible defence strategies; that is, they have phenotypically plastic traits that decrease the risk of capture and consumption by potential predators. The benefits of expressing alternative phenotypes in high- vs. low-risk environments are well documented. However, inducible anti-predator traits are also expected to incur costs, as they are not expressed when predators are absent, yet empirical evidence of such costs remains scarce. Virtually, all animals in nature are simultaneously under strong selection to evade both capture by predators and infection by parasites or pathogens and, hence, display a diverse arsenal of defences to combat these threats, raising the possibility of trade-offs between defences. A... (More)

Numerous species adopt inducible defence strategies; that is, they have phenotypically plastic traits that decrease the risk of capture and consumption by potential predators. The benefits of expressing alternative phenotypes in high- vs. low-risk environments are well documented. However, inducible anti-predator traits are also expected to incur costs, as they are not expressed when predators are absent, yet empirical evidence of such costs remains scarce. Virtually, all animals in nature are simultaneously under strong selection to evade both capture by predators and infection by parasites or pathogens and, hence, display a diverse arsenal of defences to combat these threats, raising the possibility of trade-offs between defences. A classic example of a predator-induced morphological defence is the deep-bodied shape of crucian carp that reduces risk of predation from gape-size-limited predators. The goal of this study was to examine whether predator exposure affects also immune function in crucian carp, and whether the degree of expressed morphological defence is traded off against immune function in individuals. Following exposure to manipulations of perceived risk (predator presence/absence) in a long-term experiment (8 months), key aspects of innate immune function and individual differences in the expression of inducible morphological defence were quantified. Predator-exposed individuals showed lower haptoglobin levels and complement activity, but higher natural antibody titres than fish from predator-free conditions. When experimentally challenged with a mimicked bacterial infection (LPS injection), fish reared in the presence of a natural predator showed a weaker immune response. Moreover, among predator-exposed individuals, the magnitude of morphological defence expression correlated with both baseline immune function and the ability to mount an immune response. However, these relationships were not consistently supportive of a general trade-off among defences. Our results suggest that fish exposed to predators on average reduce investment in immune function, and, further, the observed relationships among defences in predator-exposed individuals can best be explained from individual fitness and pace-of-life perspectives.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
crucian carp, eco-immunology, immune system, inducible defence, pace-of-life, phenotypic plasticity, predator-prey interactions, trade-off
in
Journal of Animal Ecology
volume
88
issue
10
pages
12 pages
publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
external identifiers
  • scopus:85068683666
  • pmid:31286512
ISSN
0021-8790
DOI
10.1111/1365-2656.13047
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
c0aecbb0-8531-41a9-8006-a187cc3d123b
date added to LUP
2019-07-24 14:35:46
date last changed
2024-04-02 14:55:08
@article{c0aecbb0-8531-41a9-8006-a187cc3d123b,
  abstract     = {{<p>Numerous species adopt inducible defence strategies; that is, they have phenotypically plastic traits that decrease the risk of capture and consumption by potential predators. The benefits of expressing alternative phenotypes in high- vs. low-risk environments are well documented. However, inducible anti-predator traits are also expected to incur costs, as they are not expressed when predators are absent, yet empirical evidence of such costs remains scarce. Virtually, all animals in nature are simultaneously under strong selection to evade both capture by predators and infection by parasites or pathogens and, hence, display a diverse arsenal of defences to combat these threats, raising the possibility of trade-offs between defences. A classic example of a predator-induced morphological defence is the deep-bodied shape of crucian carp that reduces risk of predation from gape-size-limited predators. The goal of this study was to examine whether predator exposure affects also immune function in crucian carp, and whether the degree of expressed morphological defence is traded off against immune function in individuals. Following exposure to manipulations of perceived risk (predator presence/absence) in a long-term experiment (8 months), key aspects of innate immune function and individual differences in the expression of inducible morphological defence were quantified. Predator-exposed individuals showed lower haptoglobin levels and complement activity, but higher natural antibody titres than fish from predator-free conditions. When experimentally challenged with a mimicked bacterial infection (LPS injection), fish reared in the presence of a natural predator showed a weaker immune response. Moreover, among predator-exposed individuals, the magnitude of morphological defence expression correlated with both baseline immune function and the ability to mount an immune response. However, these relationships were not consistently supportive of a general trade-off among defences. Our results suggest that fish exposed to predators on average reduce investment in immune function, and, further, the observed relationships among defences in predator-exposed individuals can best be explained from individual fitness and pace-of-life perspectives.</p>}},
  author       = {{Vinterstare, Jerker and Hegemann, Arne and Nilsson, Per Anders and Hulthén, Kaj and Brönmark, Christer}},
  issn         = {{0021-8790}},
  keywords     = {{crucian carp; eco-immunology; immune system; inducible defence; pace-of-life; phenotypic plasticity; predator-prey interactions; trade-off}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{07}},
  number       = {{10}},
  pages        = {{1510--1521}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
  series       = {{Journal of Animal Ecology}},
  title        = {{Defence versus defence : Are crucian carp trading off immune function against predator-induced morphology?}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13047}},
  doi          = {{10.1111/1365-2656.13047}},
  volume       = {{88}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}