A theory stuck in evolutionary and historical time
(2019) In Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42.- Abstract
We argue that the two temporal cognition systems are conceptually too confined to be helpful in understanding the evolution of temporal cognition. In fact, we doubt there are two systems. In relation to this, we question that the authors did not describe the results of our planning study on ravens correctly, as this is of consequence to their theory.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/e49b3366-002b-4bfe-8ff1-ca9f299cfd1a
- author
- Osvath, Mathias LU and Kabadayi, Can LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2019
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- volume
- 42
- article number
- e268
- publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85076470351
- pmid:31826758
- ISSN
- 1469-1825
- DOI
- 10.1017/S0140525X19000359
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- e49b3366-002b-4bfe-8ff1-ca9f299cfd1a
- date added to LUP
- 2020-01-14 12:37:08
- date last changed
- 2024-03-04 11:49:54
@article{e49b3366-002b-4bfe-8ff1-ca9f299cfd1a,
abstract = {{<p>We argue that the two temporal cognition systems are conceptually too confined to be helpful in understanding the evolution of temporal cognition. In fact, we doubt there are two systems. In relation to this, we question that the authors did not describe the results of our planning study on ravens correctly, as this is of consequence to their theory.</p>}},
author = {{Osvath, Mathias and Kabadayi, Can}},
issn = {{1469-1825}},
language = {{eng}},
publisher = {{Cambridge University Press}},
series = {{Behavioral and Brain Sciences}},
title = {{A theory stuck in evolutionary and historical time}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19000359}},
doi = {{10.1017/S0140525X19000359}},
volume = {{42}},
year = {{2019}},
}