Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Prognostic nomogram to predict progression-free survival in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer

Lee, C K ; Simes, R J ; Brown, C ; Lord, S ; Wagner, U ; Plante, M ; Vergote, I ; Pisano, C ; Parma, G and Burges, A , et al. (2011) In British Journal of Cancer 105(8). p.50-1144
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer are a heterogeneous group, and it is not possible to accurately predict the progression-free survival (PFS) in these patients. We developed and validated a nomogram to help improve prediction of PFS in patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS: The nomogram was developed in a training cohort (n=955) from the CALYPSO trial and validated in the AGO-OVAR 2.5 Study (n=340). The proportional-hazards model (nomogram) was based on pre-treatment characteristics.

RESULTS: The nomogram had a concordance index (C-index) of 0.645. Significant predictors were tumour size platinum-chemotherapy-free interval, CA-125, number of organ metastatic sites and... (More)

BACKGROUND: Patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer are a heterogeneous group, and it is not possible to accurately predict the progression-free survival (PFS) in these patients. We developed and validated a nomogram to help improve prediction of PFS in patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS: The nomogram was developed in a training cohort (n=955) from the CALYPSO trial and validated in the AGO-OVAR 2.5 Study (n=340). The proportional-hazards model (nomogram) was based on pre-treatment characteristics.

RESULTS: The nomogram had a concordance index (C-index) of 0.645. Significant predictors were tumour size platinum-chemotherapy-free interval, CA-125, number of organ metastatic sites and white blood count. When the nomogram was applied without CA-125 (CA-125 was not available in validation cohort), the C-indices were 0.624 (training) and 0.594 (validation). When classification was based only on the platinum-chemotherapy-free interval, the indices were 0.571 (training) and 0.560 (validation). The calibration plot in the validation cohort based on four predictors (without CA-125) suggested good agreement between actual and nomogram-predicted 12-month PFS probabilities.

CONCLUSION: This nomogram, using five pre-treatment characteristics, improves prediction of PFS in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer having platinum-based chemotherapy. It will be useful for the design and stratification of patients in clinical trials and also for counselling patients.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and , et al. (More)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and (Less)
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use, Carboplatin/therapeutic use, Cohort Studies, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy, Prognosis, Proportional Hazards Models
in
British Journal of Cancer
volume
105
issue
8
pages
50 - 1144
publisher
Nature Publishing Group
external identifiers
  • pmid:21915127
  • scopus:80053999734
ISSN
1532-1827
DOI
10.1038/bjc.2011.364
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
e7b0b8e7-3b73-4c01-8004-15b462fc9ee7
date added to LUP
2019-09-20 07:44:28
date last changed
2024-03-04 02:57:31
@article{e7b0b8e7-3b73-4c01-8004-15b462fc9ee7,
  abstract     = {{<p>BACKGROUND: Patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer are a heterogeneous group, and it is not possible to accurately predict the progression-free survival (PFS) in these patients. We developed and validated a nomogram to help improve prediction of PFS in patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.</p><p>METHODS: The nomogram was developed in a training cohort (n=955) from the CALYPSO trial and validated in the AGO-OVAR 2.5 Study (n=340). The proportional-hazards model (nomogram) was based on pre-treatment characteristics.</p><p>RESULTS: The nomogram had a concordance index (C-index) of 0.645. Significant predictors were tumour size platinum-chemotherapy-free interval, CA-125, number of organ metastatic sites and white blood count. When the nomogram was applied without CA-125 (CA-125 was not available in validation cohort), the C-indices were 0.624 (training) and 0.594 (validation). When classification was based only on the platinum-chemotherapy-free interval, the indices were 0.571 (training) and 0.560 (validation). The calibration plot in the validation cohort based on four predictors (without CA-125) suggested good agreement between actual and nomogram-predicted 12-month PFS probabilities.</p><p>CONCLUSION: This nomogram, using five pre-treatment characteristics, improves prediction of PFS in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer having platinum-based chemotherapy. It will be useful for the design and stratification of patients in clinical trials and also for counselling patients.</p>}},
  author       = {{Lee, C K and Simes, R J and Brown, C and Lord, S and Wagner, U and Plante, M and Vergote, I and Pisano, C and Parma, G and Burges, A and Bourgeois, H and Högberg, T and Bentley, J and Angleitner-Boubenizek, L and Ferrero, A and Richter, B and Hirte, H and Gebski, V and Pfisterer, J and Pujade-Lauraine, E and Friedlander, M}},
  issn         = {{1532-1827}},
  keywords     = {{Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use; Carboplatin/therapeutic use; Cohort Studies; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{10}},
  number       = {{8}},
  pages        = {{50--1144}},
  publisher    = {{Nature Publishing Group}},
  series       = {{British Journal of Cancer}},
  title        = {{Prognostic nomogram to predict progression-free survival in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.364}},
  doi          = {{10.1038/bjc.2011.364}},
  volume       = {{105}},
  year         = {{2011}},
}