Upbeat leadership : A recipe for – or against – “successful” leadership theory
(2020) In Leadership Quarterly 31(6).- Abstract
In the last 40 years, leadership studies (LS) have moved from a condition of near despair, where complaints of slow progress were commonplace, to a situation of self-confidence and self-praise. However, during recent years we have seen an upsurge in criticism alongside a contradiction between positive leadership ideas and a working life bearing little imprint of the upbeat messages said to characterize successful leaders. LS primarily produces results where “positive” leadership is correlated with various “positive” outcomes. This is made possible through unusual conventions characterizing LS, which produce a recipe for flawed, but publishable, research and career progress. This paper points at 20 elements of this recipe and argues for... (More)
In the last 40 years, leadership studies (LS) have moved from a condition of near despair, where complaints of slow progress were commonplace, to a situation of self-confidence and self-praise. However, during recent years we have seen an upsurge in criticism alongside a contradiction between positive leadership ideas and a working life bearing little imprint of the upbeat messages said to characterize successful leaders. LS primarily produces results where “positive” leadership is correlated with various “positive” outcomes. This is made possible through unusual conventions characterizing LS, which produce a recipe for flawed, but publishable, research and career progress. This paper points at 20 elements of this recipe and argues for a radical rethinking of LS norms and practices to develop more complex and sophisticated knowledge that is intellectually and methodologically sounder, facilitating less ideological and more relevant and insightful studies and research results.
(Less)
- author
- Alvesson, Mats LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020-12
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Ideology, Leadership, Methodology, Recipes
- in
- Leadership Quarterly
- volume
- 31
- issue
- 6
- article number
- 101439
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85088807884
- ISSN
- 1048-9843
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101439
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- eb10118c-c2a6-4439-9156-62442c0fcdf9
- date added to LUP
- 2020-08-10 12:47:06
- date last changed
- 2022-04-19 00:02:41
@article{eb10118c-c2a6-4439-9156-62442c0fcdf9,
abstract = {{<p>In the last 40 years, leadership studies (LS) have moved from a condition of near despair, where complaints of slow progress were commonplace, to a situation of self-confidence and self-praise. However, during recent years we have seen an upsurge in criticism alongside a contradiction between positive leadership ideas and a working life bearing little imprint of the upbeat messages said to characterize successful leaders. LS primarily produces results where “positive” leadership is correlated with various “positive” outcomes. This is made possible through unusual conventions characterizing LS, which produce a recipe for flawed, but publishable, research and career progress. This paper points at 20 elements of this recipe and argues for a radical rethinking of LS norms and practices to develop more complex and sophisticated knowledge that is intellectually and methodologically sounder, facilitating less ideological and more relevant and insightful studies and research results.</p>}},
author = {{Alvesson, Mats}},
issn = {{1048-9843}},
keywords = {{Ideology; Leadership; Methodology; Recipes}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{6}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Leadership Quarterly}},
title = {{Upbeat leadership : A recipe for – or against – “successful” leadership theory}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101439}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101439}},
volume = {{31}},
year = {{2020}},
}