Advanced

A comparison between two exercise tests on cycle; a computerised test versus the Åstand test.

Wisén, Anita LU and Wohlfart, Björn LU (1995) In Clin Physiol 15(1). p.102-91
Abstract
Two submaximal cycle ergometer test methods, the Astrand nomogram test and a computerized two-point extrapolation test (Cat Eye ergociser, commercially available), were compared in order to determine agreement and repeatability of estimates of maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max). Twenty healthy women, divided into two groups of ten according to their age (mean 35.3 and mean 46.9), performed test-retest with each method. In both methods the VO2max was estimated from workload and the corresponding heart rate. The correlation between the VO2max using the two methods was high (r = 0.85, P < 0.001). Some of the estimates derived from the computerized test had large errors, which reduced the agreement between the tests. The variation (2SD),... (More)
Two submaximal cycle ergometer test methods, the Astrand nomogram test and a computerized two-point extrapolation test (Cat Eye ergociser, commercially available), were compared in order to determine agreement and repeatability of estimates of maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max). Twenty healthy women, divided into two groups of ten according to their age (mean 35.3 and mean 46.9), performed test-retest with each method. In both methods the VO2max was estimated from workload and the corresponding heart rate. The correlation between the VO2max using the two methods was high (r = 0.85, P < 0.001). Some of the estimates derived from the computerized test had large errors, which reduced the agreement between the tests. The variation (2SD), expressed in per cent of mean VO2max was 19% for the Astrand test and 34% for the computerized test. Furthermore, the computerized test underestimated the VO2max with approximately 5 ml kg-1 min-1 compared with the Astrand test. Due to this underestimation and the greater variation of the VO2max in the computerized test, it is not recommended to use the two methods interchangeably in clinical practice. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Clin Physiol
volume
15
issue
1
pages
102 - 91
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
f1cb5832-828f-4e7c-a7ed-8d1e3a479c67 (old id 3304708)
alternative location
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=A%20comparison%20between%20two%20exercise%20tests%20on%20cycle%3B%20a%20computerised%20test%20versus%20the%20%C3%85stand%20test.
date added to LUP
2012-12-20 14:42:08
date last changed
2016-04-16 11:33:41
@misc{f1cb5832-828f-4e7c-a7ed-8d1e3a479c67,
  abstract     = {Two submaximal cycle ergometer test methods, the Astrand nomogram test and a computerized two-point extrapolation test (Cat Eye ergociser, commercially available), were compared in order to determine agreement and repeatability of estimates of maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max). Twenty healthy women, divided into two groups of ten according to their age (mean 35.3 and mean 46.9), performed test-retest with each method. In both methods the VO2max was estimated from workload and the corresponding heart rate. The correlation between the VO2max using the two methods was high (r = 0.85, P &lt; 0.001). Some of the estimates derived from the computerized test had large errors, which reduced the agreement between the tests. The variation (2SD), expressed in per cent of mean VO2max was 19% for the Astrand test and 34% for the computerized test. Furthermore, the computerized test underestimated the VO2max with approximately 5 ml kg-1 min-1 compared with the Astrand test. Due to this underestimation and the greater variation of the VO2max in the computerized test, it is not recommended to use the two methods interchangeably in clinical practice.},
  author       = {Wisén, Anita and Wohlfart, Björn},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {102--91},
  series       = {Clin Physiol},
  title        = {A comparison between two exercise tests on cycle; a computerised test versus the Åstand test.},
  volume       = {15},
  year         = {1995},
}