Advanced

Reflexivity, Positionality, and Power: Thinking Through Ethnographic Studies From Middle Eastern Field Settings

Farsakoglu, Eda LU and Scott, Katrine LU (2014) Fourth World Congress for Middle East Studies (WOCMES)
Abstract
To examine the conditions of knowledge production, reflexivity is an essential methodological tool of post-positivist research notably used by critical and feminist researchers. However, in recent years, reflexive research accounts have heavily become self-telling and often been limited to concerns of issues of insiderness/outsiderness in the analysis of the relationship between the researcher and the researched. Building upon a strong body of feminist and methodological literature on reflexivity, positionality, subjectivity and power, this paper critically analyses the usefulness of the binary categories of insider/outsider. Specifically, we aim at reflecting upon two issues. First, we want to go beyond the binary opposition between being... (More)
To examine the conditions of knowledge production, reflexivity is an essential methodological tool of post-positivist research notably used by critical and feminist researchers. However, in recent years, reflexive research accounts have heavily become self-telling and often been limited to concerns of issues of insiderness/outsiderness in the analysis of the relationship between the researcher and the researched. Building upon a strong body of feminist and methodological literature on reflexivity, positionality, subjectivity and power, this paper critically analyses the usefulness of the binary categories of insider/outsider. Specifically, we aim at reflecting upon two issues. First, we want to go beyond the binary opposition between being either the outsider researcher or the insider participant by arguing that both researchers and participants shift across identities and multiple boundaries in entering and leaving the field, as well as in the sharing and collecting of data. Second, we suggest that an intersubjective and intersectional reading of the relations between the researcher and the researched in our reflexive research accounts can also be used as data to deepen our understanding about the formations and fluidity of Middle Eastern identities, communities, and politics. This complex methodological reading adds an important perspective to the analysis by situating and capturing the socio-political content and context of our research.

In this paper, we take ‘the field’ as the starting point for our methodological analysis, and we draw on our own ethnographic fieldwork experiences in Turkey and in the Kurdish Region in Iraq. One study is taking place among Iranian queer refugees in the transit migratory space of Turkey and the other is situated in the Kurdish Region in Iraq among university students. Common for both feminist ethnographic studies is the focus on everyday lives and how these are organized around lines of race/ethnicity, class, gender, generation, and sexuality (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to conference
publication status
unpublished
subject
conference name
Fourth World Congress for Middle East Studies (WOCMES)
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
3162bebf-1531-4618-b454-23f963932145 (old id 4991891)
date added to LUP
2015-01-30 08:34:25
date last changed
2016-04-16 12:39:25
@misc{3162bebf-1531-4618-b454-23f963932145,
  abstract     = {To examine the conditions of knowledge production, reflexivity is an essential methodological tool of post-positivist research notably used by critical and feminist researchers. However, in recent years, reflexive research accounts have heavily become self-telling and often been limited to concerns of issues of insiderness/outsiderness in the analysis of the relationship between the researcher and the researched. Building upon a strong body of feminist and methodological literature on reflexivity, positionality, subjectivity and power, this paper critically analyses the usefulness of the binary categories of insider/outsider. Specifically, we aim at reflecting upon two issues. First, we want to go beyond the binary opposition between being either the outsider researcher or the insider participant by arguing that both researchers and participants shift across identities and multiple boundaries in entering and leaving the field, as well as in the sharing and collecting of data. Second, we suggest that an intersubjective and intersectional reading of the relations between the researcher and the researched in our reflexive research accounts can also be used as data to deepen our understanding about the formations and fluidity of Middle Eastern identities, communities, and politics. This complex methodological reading adds an important perspective to the analysis by situating and capturing the socio-political content and context of our research. <br/><br>
In this paper, we take ‘the field’ as the starting point for our methodological analysis, and we draw on our own ethnographic fieldwork experiences in Turkey and in the Kurdish Region in Iraq. One study is taking place among Iranian queer refugees in the transit migratory space of Turkey and the other is situated in the Kurdish Region in Iraq among university students. Common for both feminist ethnographic studies is the focus on everyday lives and how these are organized around lines of race/ethnicity, class, gender, generation, and sexuality},
  author       = {Farsakoglu, Eda and Scott, Katrine},
  language     = {eng},
  title        = {Reflexivity, Positionality, and Power: Thinking Through Ethnographic Studies From Middle Eastern Field Settings},
  year         = {2014},
}