Advanced

Comparing Ordinal and Ratio Scale Data in Requirements Prioritisation

Karlsson, Lena LU and Regnell, Björn LU (2005) 3rd International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering (CERE'05) In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering (CERE'05)
Abstract
The importance of prioritising requirements is widely recognised. A number of different techniques for prioritising requirements have been proposed, some based on an ordinal scale, others on a ratio scale. Different scales provide different levels of information, e.g. the ratio scale is richer than the ordinal scale. This paper aims to investigate the difference in information and aim to find ways to measure and compare the different levels of information. This is important since techniques using a richer scale tend to be more time-consuming and complex to use. Thus, there is a trade-off between simple techniques yielding less information

and complex techniques yielding more information.

The paper suggests three... (More)
The importance of prioritising requirements is widely recognised. A number of different techniques for prioritising requirements have been proposed, some based on an ordinal scale, others on a ratio scale. Different scales provide different levels of information, e.g. the ratio scale is richer than the ordinal scale. This paper aims to investigate the difference in information and aim to find ways to measure and compare the different levels of information. This is important since techniques using a richer scale tend to be more time-consuming and complex to use. Thus, there is a trade-off between simple techniques yielding less information

and complex techniques yielding more information.

The paper suggests three approaches to compare the level of information inherent in the two scales, and one way to design the cost-value diagram when the priorities are based on ranks. An empirical data set was used to verify the suggested approaches. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
publication status
published
subject
in
Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering (CERE'05)
conference name
3rd International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering (CERE'05)
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
a9fc76a3-4a5c-4341-9cfc-1dbd3a71c3bc (old id 775867)
date added to LUP
2007-12-19 12:45:06
date last changed
2016-04-16 11:25:24
@misc{a9fc76a3-4a5c-4341-9cfc-1dbd3a71c3bc,
  abstract     = {The importance of prioritising requirements is widely recognised. A number of different techniques for prioritising requirements have been proposed, some based on an ordinal scale, others on a ratio scale. Different scales provide different levels of information, e.g. the ratio scale is richer than the ordinal scale. This paper aims to investigate the difference in information and aim to find ways to measure and compare the different levels of information. This is important since techniques using a richer scale tend to be more time-consuming and complex to use. Thus, there is a trade-off between simple techniques yielding less information <br/><br>
and complex techniques yielding more information. <br/><br>
The paper suggests three approaches to compare the level of information inherent in the two scales, and one way to design the cost-value diagram when the priorities are based on ranks. An empirical data set was used to verify the suggested approaches.},
  author       = {Karlsson, Lena and Regnell, Björn},
  language     = {eng},
  series       = {Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering (CERE'05)},
  title        = {Comparing Ordinal and Ratio Scale Data in Requirements Prioritisation},
  year         = {2005},
}