Advanced

Critical reflections on municipal risk and vulnerability analyses as decision support tools : the role of regulation regimes

Vastveit, Kirsti Russell; Eriksson, Kerstin LU and Njå, Ove (2014) In Environment Systems and Decisions 34(3). p.443-455
Abstract

Risk and vulnerability analyses are a required decision support tool in processes to improve societal safety and crisis preparedness at national, regional and local levels in several European states. Analyses result in risk images, which are the stakeholders’ views of events that must be addressed in planning processes related to topics such as land use and crisis management. Hence, risk and vulnerability analyses are used to support decisions regarding which issue areas to prioritize, as well as to choose between alternatives. In Norway and Sweden, municipal risk and vulnerability analyses are mandated and described in regulations, laws and guidelines. This article examines how the two countries’ regulation regimes address,... (More)

Risk and vulnerability analyses are a required decision support tool in processes to improve societal safety and crisis preparedness at national, regional and local levels in several European states. Analyses result in risk images, which are the stakeholders’ views of events that must be addressed in planning processes related to topics such as land use and crisis management. Hence, risk and vulnerability analyses are used to support decisions regarding which issue areas to prioritize, as well as to choose between alternatives. In Norway and Sweden, municipal risk and vulnerability analyses are mandated and described in regulations, laws and guidelines. This article examines how the two countries’ regulation regimes address, characterize and facilitate risk-based decision-making. We found that the Swedish regulation regime emphasizes use of risk and vulnerability analyses in decision-making regarding emergency preparedness. In Norway, this is also an important issue, but decision-making with regard to long-term and strategic planning is also emphasized. In both regulation regimes, decision-makers must determine on their own how they should use the analyses as a foundation for decision-making regarding emergency preparedness and societal safety. While the regulation regimes contain method and content prescriptions, they do not specify how criteria regarding desirable levels of preparedness and societal safety should be determined, nor who should be involved in such processes. These are challenges that should be addressed in regulation guidelines and in audits carried out by regional authorities.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Decision-making, Municipalities, Regulation, Risk and vulnerability analysis
in
Environment Systems and Decisions
volume
34
issue
3
pages
443 - 455
publisher
Springer Science + Business Media
external identifiers
  • Scopus:84939897461
ISSN
2194-5403
DOI
10.1007/s10669-014-9510-9
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
97986456-7c84-4874-b203-6644a21337f4
date added to LUP
2016-04-11 09:37:49
date last changed
2016-04-11 09:37:49
@misc{97986456-7c84-4874-b203-6644a21337f4,
  abstract     = {<p>Risk and vulnerability analyses are a required decision support tool in processes to improve societal safety and crisis preparedness at national, regional and local levels in several European states. Analyses result in risk images, which are the stakeholders’ views of events that must be addressed in planning processes related to topics such as land use and crisis management. Hence, risk and vulnerability analyses are used to support decisions regarding which issue areas to prioritize, as well as to choose between alternatives. In Norway and Sweden, municipal risk and vulnerability analyses are mandated and described in regulations, laws and guidelines. This article examines how the two countries’ regulation regimes address, characterize and facilitate risk-based decision-making. We found that the Swedish regulation regime emphasizes use of risk and vulnerability analyses in decision-making regarding emergency preparedness. In Norway, this is also an important issue, but decision-making with regard to long-term and strategic planning is also emphasized. In both regulation regimes, decision-makers must determine on their own how they should use the analyses as a foundation for decision-making regarding emergency preparedness and societal safety. While the regulation regimes contain method and content prescriptions, they do not specify how criteria regarding desirable levels of preparedness and societal safety should be determined, nor who should be involved in such processes. These are challenges that should be addressed in regulation guidelines and in audits carried out by regional authorities.</p>},
  author       = {Vastveit, Kirsti Russell and Eriksson, Kerstin and Njå, Ove},
  issn         = {2194-5403},
  keyword      = {Decision-making,Municipalities,Regulation,Risk and vulnerability analysis},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {443--455},
  publisher    = {ARRAY(0x8e2eb50)},
  series       = {Environment Systems and Decisions},
  title        = {Critical reflections on municipal risk and vulnerability analyses as decision support tools : the role of regulation regimes},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9510-9},
  volume       = {34},
  year         = {2014},
}