Flee or fight uncertainty : Plant strategies in relation to anticipated damage
(1999) In Ecology Letters 2(6). p.361-366- Abstract
In order to cope with damage, plants have evolved a number of strategies. We incorporate two of those strategies, compensatory regrowth and escaping damage in time, into a mathematical model in an attempt to outline under what circumstances one or the other of these phenotypic traits will evolve. Escaping damage in time is accomplished by flowering and setting seeds at a point of time when the risk of damage is low, whereas a compensatory capacity is made possible by activating a proportion of meristems that are left dormant. Our analysis suggests that damage that is predictable in time will favour phenotypes that flower late in the season and that have a good compensatory capacity. As damage becomes less predictable in time, a strategy... (More)
In order to cope with damage, plants have evolved a number of strategies. We incorporate two of those strategies, compensatory regrowth and escaping damage in time, into a mathematical model in an attempt to outline under what circumstances one or the other of these phenotypic traits will evolve. Escaping damage in time is accomplished by flowering and setting seeds at a point of time when the risk of damage is low, whereas a compensatory capacity is made possible by activating a proportion of meristems that are left dormant. Our analysis suggests that damage that is predictable in time will favour phenotypes that flower late in the season and that have a good compensatory capacity. As damage becomes less predictable in time, a strategy that implies flowering as early as possible in the season and with no compensatory capacity at all, becomes advantageous.
(Less)
- author
- Järemo, Johannes LU ; Ripa, Jörgen LU and Nilsson, Patric LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 1999
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Bet-hedging, Bud dormancy, Compensation, Damage, Flowering time, Herbivory, Predictability
- in
- Ecology Letters
- volume
- 2
- issue
- 6
- pages
- 6 pages
- publisher
- Wiley-Blackwell
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:0032717387
- ISSN
- 1461-023X
- DOI
- 10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00095.x
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- d9c773af-7780-4610-9e74-ac223a3ecdde
- date added to LUP
- 2016-08-23 16:02:27
- date last changed
- 2022-01-30 05:41:26
@article{d9c773af-7780-4610-9e74-ac223a3ecdde, abstract = {{<p>In order to cope with damage, plants have evolved a number of strategies. We incorporate two of those strategies, compensatory regrowth and escaping damage in time, into a mathematical model in an attempt to outline under what circumstances one or the other of these phenotypic traits will evolve. Escaping damage in time is accomplished by flowering and setting seeds at a point of time when the risk of damage is low, whereas a compensatory capacity is made possible by activating a proportion of meristems that are left dormant. Our analysis suggests that damage that is predictable in time will favour phenotypes that flower late in the season and that have a good compensatory capacity. As damage becomes less predictable in time, a strategy that implies flowering as early as possible in the season and with no compensatory capacity at all, becomes advantageous.</p>}}, author = {{Järemo, Johannes and Ripa, Jörgen and Nilsson, Patric}}, issn = {{1461-023X}}, keywords = {{Bet-hedging; Bud dormancy; Compensation; Damage; Flowering time; Herbivory; Predictability}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{6}}, pages = {{361--366}}, publisher = {{Wiley-Blackwell}}, series = {{Ecology Letters}}, title = {{Flee or fight uncertainty : Plant strategies in relation to anticipated damage}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00095.x}}, doi = {{10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00095.x}}, volume = {{2}}, year = {{1999}}, }