LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Digitalization and Privacy : A systematic literature review
- Type
- Report
- Publ. year
- 2016
- Author/s
- Svensson, Måns; Rosengren, Calle; Åström, Fredrik
- Department/s
- Lund University Internet Institute (LUii); Department of Sociology of Law; Centre for Work Environment and Leadership; Centre for Work, Technology and Social Change (WTS); Department of Scholarly Communication
- In LUP since
- 2016-12-21
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 4095 | 308 | 15 |
India  |
567 (14%) |
Austria  |
408 (10%) |
United States of America  |
320 (8%) |
Sweden  |
307 (7%) |
Germany  |
293 (7%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
151 (4%) |
Philippines  |
129 (3%) |
Thailand  |
121 (3%) |
Australia  |
88 (2%) |
China  |
80 (2%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
78 (2%) |
Nigeria  |
69 (2%) |
Kenya  |
63 (2%) |
Pakistan  |
59 (1%) |
South Africa  |
58 (1%) |
Switzerland  |
57 (1%) |
Malaysia  |
55 (1%) |
Indonesia  |
53 (1%) |
France  |
52 (1%) |
Finland  |
45 (1%) |
Canada  |
43 (1%) |
Russian Federation  |
43 (1%) |
Portugal  |
38 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
37 (1%) |
Singapore  |
36 (1%) |
Unknown  |
36 (1%) |
Sri Lanka  |
35 (1%) |
Ghana  |
33 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
30 (1%) |
Denmark  |
28 (1%) |
Italy  |
27 (1%) |
Ethiopia  |
27 (1%) |
South Korea  |
26 (1%) |
Viet Nam  |
24 (1%) |
Norway  |
24 (1%) |
Egypt  |
21 (1%) |
Belgium  |
20 (0%) |
Zimbabwe  |
20 (0%) |
Nepal  |
18 (0%) |
Ireland  |
17 (0%) |
Uganda  |
17 (0%) |
Morocco  |
16 (0%) |
Greece  |
15 (0%) |
Czechia  |
15 (0%) |
Brazil  |
14 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
14 (0%) |
Spain  |
14 (0%) |
Albania  |
13 (0%) |
Iran  |
13 (0%) |
Bangladesh  |
13 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
10 (0%) |
Qatar  |
10 (0%) |
Serbia  |
10 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
10 (0%) |
Romania  |
10 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
9 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
9 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
9 (0%) |
Namibia  |
9 (0%) |
Poland  |
8 (0%) |
Japan  |
8 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
8 (0%) |
Hungary  |
8 (0%) |
Ukraine  |
8 (0%) |
Mauritius  |
7 (0%) |
Cyprus  |
7 (0%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
6 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
6 (0%) |
Oman  |
6 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
6 (0%) |
Zambia  |
6 (0%) |
Botswana  |
6 (0%) |
Croatia  |
6 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
5 (0%) |
Peru  |
5 (0%) |
Cambodia  |
5 (0%) |
Sierra Leone  |
5 (0%) |
Uzbekistan  |
4 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam  |
4 (0%) |
Jordan  |
4 (0%) |
Afghanistan  |
4 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
4 (0%) |
Estonia  |
3 (0%) |
Papua New Guinea  |
3 (0%) |
South Sudan  |
3 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
3 (0%) |
Colombia  |
3 (0%) |
Israel  |
3 (0%) |
Latvia  |
3 (0%) |
Yemen  |
3 (0%) |
Malta  |
3 (0%) |
Azerbaijan  |
3 (0%) |
Malawi  |
3 (0%) |
Sudan  |
3 (0%) |
Eswatini  |
2 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
2 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
2 (0%) |
Panama  |
2 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
2 (0%) |
Madagascar  |
2 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
2 (0%) |
Iraq  |
2 (0%) |
Mexico  |
2 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
2 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
2 (0%) |
Jamaica  |
2 (0%) |
Georgia  |
2 (0%) |
Kyrgyzstan  |
2 (0%) |
Curacao  |
2 (0%) |
Cameroon  |
2 (0%) |
Ecuador  |
2 (0%) |
Senegal  |
2 (0%) |
Libya  |
1 (0%) |
Lesotho  |
1 (0%) |
Gambia  |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
1 (0%) |
Chile  |
1 (0%) |
Algeria  |
1 (0%) |
Fiji  |
1 (0%) |
Congo  |
1 (0%) |
Faroe Islands  |
1 (0%) |
Uruguay  |
1 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
1 (0%) |
Belize  |
1 (0%) |
Armenia  |
1 (0%) |
Belarus  |
1 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory  |
1 (0%) |
Somalia  |
1 (0%) |
Isle of Man  |
1 (0%) |
Djibouti  |
1 (0%) |
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)  |
1 (0%) |
Nicaragua  |
1 (0%) |
Maldives  |
1 (0%) |