LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- PRO-POOR PLANNING: A Tool for Strategic Territorial Planning and a Conceptual Framework Drawn from Studies in Colombia and Costa Rica
- Type
- Dissertation
- Publ. year
- 2009
- Author/s
- de la Espriella, Carlos
- Department/s
- Housing Development and Management
- In LUP since
- 2016-04-01
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 2472 | 9 | 1 |
Germany  |
369 (15%) |
United States of America  |
185 (7%) |
Sweden  |
157 (6%) |
India  |
130 (5%) |
South Africa  |
116 (5%) |
Nigeria  |
102 (4%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
100 (4%) |
Philippines  |
74 (3%) |
Indonesia  |
69 (3%) |
Kenya  |
68 (3%) |
China  |
67 (3%) |
Ethiopia  |
64 (3%) |
France  |
63 (3%) |
Australia  |
50 (2%) |
Zimbabwe  |
45 (2%) |
Ukraine  |
43 (2%) |
Bangladesh  |
39 (2%) |
Malaysia  |
34 (1%) |
Canada  |
32 (1%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
30 (1%) |
Uganda  |
30 (1%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
27 (1%) |
Iran  |
26 (1%) |
Pakistan  |
26 (1%) |
Ghana  |
25 (1%) |
Russian Federation  |
24 (1%) |
Colombia  |
22 (1%) |
European Union location  |
20 (1%) |
Zambia  |
17 (1%) |
Viet Nam  |
14 (1%) |
Egypt  |
12 (0%) |
Belgium  |
12 (0%) |
Italy  |
12 (0%) |
Eswatini  |
11 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
11 (0%) |
Somalia  |
11 (0%) |
Finland  |
11 (0%) |
Czechia  |
10 (0%) |
Denmark  |
10 (0%) |
Unknown  |
10 (0%) |
Malawi  |
9 (0%) |
Nepal  |
9 (0%) |
Israel  |
9 (0%) |
Thailand  |
9 (0%) |
Spain  |
9 (0%) |
Ecuador  |
9 (0%) |
Ireland  |
8 (0%) |
South Korea  |
8 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
8 (0%) |
Turkiye  |
8 (0%) |
Singapore  |
8 (0%) |
Costa Rica  |
8 (0%) |
Brazil  |
8 (0%) |
Mexico  |
8 (0%) |
Namibia  |
8 (0%) |
Liberia  |
7 (0%) |
Botswana  |
7 (0%) |
Mauritius  |
6 (0%) |
Norway  |
6 (0%) |
Jordan  |
6 (0%) |
Cameroon  |
6 (0%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
6 (0%) |
Albania  |
5 (0%) |
Serbia  |
5 (0%) |
Romania  |
5 (0%) |
Japan  |
4 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
4 (0%) |
Cambodia  |
4 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
4 (0%) |
Unknown (Satellite Provider)  |
4 (0%) |
Austria  |
4 (0%) |
Qatar  |
3 (0%) |
Lesotho  |
3 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
3 (0%) |
Bolivia  |
3 (0%) |
Djibouti  |
3 (0%) |
Chile  |
3 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
2 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
2 (0%) |
Iceland  |
2 (0%) |
Iraq  |
2 (0%) |
Switzerland  |
2 (0%) |
Portugal  |
2 (0%) |
Argentina  |
2 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
2 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
2 (0%) |
Oman  |
2 (0%) |
Venezuela  |
2 (0%) |
Afghanistan  |
2 (0%) |
Mozambique  |
2 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
2 (0%) |
Montenegro  |
1 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
1 (0%) |
Angola  |
1 (0%) |
Martinique  |
1 (0%) |
Sudan  |
1 (0%) |
Solomon Islands  |
1 (0%) |
Jamaica  |
1 (0%) |
Unknown (Anonymous Proxy)  |
1 (0%) |
Panama  |
1 (0%) |
Belarus  |
1 (0%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
1 (0%) |
Senegal  |
1 (0%) |
Maldives  |
1 (0%) |
Timor-Leste  |
1 (0%) |
Greece  |
1 (0%) |
Haiti  |
1 (0%) |
Gambia  |
1 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
1 (0%) |
Armenia  |
1 (0%) |
Honduras  |
1 (0%) |
Belize  |
1 (0%) |
Bhutan  |
1 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory  |
1 (0%) |
Estonia  |
1 (0%) |
Togo  |
1 (0%) |
Peru  |
1 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
1 (0%) |
Uzbekistan  |
1 (0%) |
Azerbaijan  |
1 (0%) |
Guatemala  |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
1 (0%) |
Antigua and Barbuda  |
1 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire  |
1 (0%) |
Uruguay  |
1 (0%) |
Yemen  |
1 (0%) |
Libya  |
1 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic  |
1 (0%) |
Poland  |
1 (0%) |
Algeria  |
1 (0%) |