LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- A systematic review on regression test selection techniques
- Type
- Journal Article
- Publ. year
- 2010
- Author/s
- Engström, Emelie; Runeson, Per; Skoglund, Mats
- Department/s
- Department of Computer Science; Software Engineering Research Group; ELLIIT: the Linköping-Lund initiative on IT and mobile communication
- In LUP since
- 2016-04-01
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 2875 | 36 | 2 |
United States of America  |
584 (20%) |
India  |
452 (16%) |
Sweden  |
227 (8%) |
Germany  |
164 (6%) |
China  |
130 (5%) |
Pakistan  |
105 (4%) |
Canada  |
102 (4%) |
Brazil  |
75 (3%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
69 (2%) |
Malaysia  |
68 (2%) |
France  |
63 (2%) |
Indonesia  |
45 (2%) |
Russian Federation  |
42 (1%) |
Iran  |
38 (1%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
33 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
29 (1%) |
Jordan  |
26 (1%) |
Japan  |
24 (1%) |
Finland  |
24 (1%) |
Egypt  |
23 (1%) |
Australia  |
22 (1%) |
Austria  |
22 (1%) |
Unknown  |
19 (1%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
17 (1%) |
Belgium  |
17 (1%) |
Denmark  |
16 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
16 (1%) |
Nigeria  |
16 (1%) |
Italy  |
16 (1%) |
Thailand  |
16 (1%) |
Spain  |
16 (1%) |
Philippines  |
15 (1%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
15 (1%) |
New Zealand  |
15 (1%) |
Ireland  |
14 (0%) |
South Korea  |
14 (0%) |
Ukraine  |
13 (0%) |
South Africa  |
11 (0%) |
Nepal  |
10 (0%) |
Mexico  |
10 (0%) |
Portugal  |
9 (0%) |
Bangladesh  |
9 (0%) |
Latvia  |
9 (0%) |
Viet Nam  |
9 (0%) |
Ethiopia  |
9 (0%) |
Kenya  |
9 (0%) |
Hungary  |
9 (0%) |
Singapore  |
9 (0%) |
Czechia  |
8 (0%) |
European Union location  |
8 (0%) |
Norway  |
7 (0%) |
Romania  |
7 (0%) |
Ghana  |
7 (0%) |
Greece  |
6 (0%) |
Ecuador  |
6 (0%) |
Morocco  |
6 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
6 (0%) |
Iraq  |
6 (0%) |
Mauritius  |
5 (0%) |
Zimbabwe  |
5 (0%) |
Switzerland  |
5 (0%) |
Puerto Rico  |
5 (0%) |
Poland  |
4 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
4 (0%) |
Albania  |
4 (0%) |
Israel  |
4 (0%) |
Croatia  |
4 (0%) |
Algeria  |
4 (0%) |
Asia-Pacific location  |
4 (0%) |
Belarus  |
3 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
3 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
3 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
3 (0%) |
Myanmar  |
3 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory  |
3 (0%) |
Peru  |
3 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
2 (0%) |
Libya  |
2 (0%) |
Uganda  |
2 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
2 (0%) |
Argentina  |
2 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
2 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
2 (0%) |
Oman  |
2 (0%) |
Serbia  |
2 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
1 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
1 (0%) |
Venezuela  |
1 (0%) |
Sudan  |
1 (0%) |
Yemen  |
1 (0%) |
Somalia  |
1 (0%) |
Panama  |
1 (0%) |
Mongolia  |
1 (0%) |
Estonia  |
1 (0%) |
Senegal  |
1 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
1 (0%) |
Uruguay  |
1 (0%) |
Guatemala  |
1 (0%) |
Chile  |
1 (0%) |
Congo  |
1 (0%) |
Isle of Man  |
1 (0%) |