LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Simulation of critical evacuation conditions for a fire scenario involving cables and comparison of two different cables
- Type
- Report
- Publ. year
- 2010
- Author/s
- Van Hees, Patrick; Nilsson, Daniel; Berggren, Emil
- Department/s
- Division of Fire Safety Engineering; Fire modeling-lup-obsolete
- In LUP since
- 2016-04-01
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 3483 | 56 | 4 |
Germany  |
293 (8%) |
South Africa  |
260 (7%) |
United States of America  |
228 (7%) |
Sweden  |
154 (4%) |
Russian Federation  |
149 (4%) |
France  |
139 (4%) |
India  |
134 (4%) |
Italy  |
133 (4%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
130 (4%) |
China  |
91 (3%) |
Thailand  |
91 (3%) |
Brazil  |
85 (2%) |
Indonesia  |
82 (2%) |
Poland  |
74 (2%) |
Ukraine  |
67 (2%) |
Australia  |
62 (2%) |
South Korea  |
60 (2%) |
Singapore  |
58 (2%) |
Czechia  |
57 (2%) |
Philippines  |
47 (1%) |
Japan  |
47 (1%) |
Iran  |
46 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
43 (1%) |
Canada  |
40 (1%) |
Spain  |
39 (1%) |
Malaysia  |
38 (1%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
37 (1%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
31 (1%) |
Belgium  |
29 (1%) |
Cambodia  |
29 (1%) |
Colombia  |
27 (1%) |
Egypt  |
26 (1%) |
Turkiye  |
26 (1%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
24 (1%) |
Unknown  |
22 (1%) |
Romania  |
22 (1%) |
Denmark  |
22 (1%) |
Portugal  |
19 (1%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
17 (0%) |
Bangladesh  |
17 (0%) |
Viet Nam  |
17 (0%) |
Greece  |
16 (0%) |
Norway  |
16 (0%) |
Mexico  |
15 (0%) |
Qatar  |
15 (0%) |
Nepal  |
14 (0%) |
Ecuador  |
14 (0%) |
Pakistan  |
13 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
13 (0%) |
Hungary  |
13 (0%) |
Switzerland  |
12 (0%) |
Ireland  |
12 (0%) |
Finland  |
11 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
11 (0%) |
Croatia  |
11 (0%) |
Chile  |
11 (0%) |
Ghana  |
10 (0%) |
Serbia  |
10 (0%) |
Argentina  |
10 (0%) |
Nigeria  |
10 (0%) |
Iceland  |
8 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
8 (0%) |
Israel  |
8 (0%) |
Kenya  |
8 (0%) |
Oman  |
7 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
7 (0%) |
European Union location  |
7 (0%) |
Austria  |
7 (0%) |
Algeria  |
7 (0%) |
Albania  |
6 (0%) |
Georgia  |
6 (0%) |
Iraq  |
6 (0%) |
Mauritius  |
5 (0%) |
Kyrgyzstan  |
4 (0%) |
Peru  |
4 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
4 (0%) |
Venezuela  |
4 (0%) |
Belarus  |
4 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
4 (0%) |
Kazakhstan  |
4 (0%) |
Malawi  |
4 (0%) |
Morocco  |
4 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory  |
4 (0%) |
Jordan  |
4 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
4 (0%) |
Angola  |
4 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
4 (0%) |
Honduras  |
3 (0%) |
Cyprus  |
3 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
3 (0%) |
Zambia  |
3 (0%) |
Cameroon  |
3 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
3 (0%) |
Azerbaijan  |
3 (0%) |
Armenia  |
3 (0%) |
Jamaica  |
3 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
3 (0%) |
Latvia  |
3 (0%) |
Botswana  |
3 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
2 (0%) |
Asia-Pacific location  |
2 (0%) |
Bahrain  |
2 (0%) |
Costa Rica  |
2 (0%) |
Mongolia  |
2 (0%) |
Yemen  |
2 (0%) |
Eswatini  |
2 (0%) |
Barbados  |
2 (0%) |
Zimbabwe  |
2 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
2 (0%) |
Malta  |
2 (0%) |
Estonia  |
2 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of  |
2 (0%) |
Nicaragua  |
2 (0%) |
Gabon  |
1 (0%) |
Seychelles  |
1 (0%) |
Mali  |
1 (0%) |
Afghanistan  |
1 (0%) |
Panama  |
1 (0%) |
Timor-Leste  |
1 (0%) |
Unknown (Anonymous Proxy)  |
1 (0%) |
Lesotho  |
1 (0%) |
Guatemala  |
1 (0%) |
Bolivia  |
1 (0%) |
Faroe Islands  |
1 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
1 (0%) |
Montenegro  |
1 (0%) |
Haiti  |
1 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam  |
1 (0%) |
Maldives  |
1 (0%) |
Uganda  |
1 (0%) |
Libya  |
1 (0%) |