LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Simulation of critical evacuation conditions for a fire scenario involving cables and comparison of two different cables
- Type
- Report
- Publ. year
- 2010
- Author/s
- Van Hees, Patrick; Nilsson, Daniel; Berggren, Emil
- Department/s
- Division of Fire Safety Engineering; Fire modeling-lup-obsolete
- In LUP since
- 2016-04-01
Downloads
Total | This Year | This Month |
3484 | 57 | 1 |
Germany | 293 (8%) |
South Africa | 260 (7%) |
United States of America | 228 (7%) |
Sweden | 154 (4%) |
Russian Federation | 149 (4%) |
France | 139 (4%) |
Italy | 134 (4%) |
India | 134 (4%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 130 (4%) |
Thailand | 91 (3%) |
China | 91 (3%) |
Brazil | 85 (2%) |
Indonesia | 82 (2%) |
Poland | 74 (2%) |
Ukraine | 67 (2%) |
Australia | 62 (2%) |
South Korea | 60 (2%) |
Singapore | 58 (2%) |
Czechia | 57 (2%) |
Japan | 47 (1%) |
Philippines | 47 (1%) |
Iran | 46 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China) | 43 (1%) |
Canada | 40 (1%) |
Spain | 39 (1%) |
Malaysia | 38 (1%) |
Saudi Arabia | 37 (1%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) | 31 (1%) |
Belgium | 29 (1%) |
Cambodia | 29 (1%) |
Colombia | 27 (1%) |
Egypt | 26 (1%) |
Turkiye | 26 (1%) |
United Arab Emirates | 24 (1%) |
Unknown | 22 (1%) |
Denmark | 22 (1%) |
Romania | 22 (1%) |
Portugal | 19 (1%) |
Bangladesh | 17 (0%) |
Taiwan (China) | 17 (0%) |
Viet Nam | 17 (0%) |
Norway | 16 (0%) |
Greece | 16 (0%) |
Qatar | 15 (0%) |
Mexico | 15 (0%) |
Nepal | 14 (0%) |
Ecuador | 14 (0%) |
Pakistan | 13 (0%) |
Hungary | 13 (0%) |
Bulgaria | 13 (0%) |
Ireland | 12 (0%) |
Switzerland | 12 (0%) |
Chile | 11 (0%) |
New Zealand | 11 (0%) |
Finland | 11 (0%) |
Croatia | 11 (0%) |
Nigeria | 10 (0%) |
Argentina | 10 (0%) |
Ghana | 10 (0%) |
Serbia | 10 (0%) |
Lebanon | 8 (0%) |
Israel | 8 (0%) |
Iceland | 8 (0%) |
Kenya | 8 (0%) |
European Union location | 7 (0%) |
Algeria | 7 (0%) |
Oman | 7 (0%) |
Austria | 7 (0%) |
Slovakia | 7 (0%) |
Georgia | 6 (0%) |
Albania | 6 (0%) |
Iraq | 6 (0%) |
Mauritius | 5 (0%) |
Angola | 4 (0%) |
Lithuania | 4 (0%) |
Peru | 4 (0%) |
Kyrgyzstan | 4 (0%) |
Morocco | 4 (0%) |
Tunisia | 4 (0%) |
Malawi | 4 (0%) |
Jordan | 4 (0%) |
Kazakhstan | 4 (0%) |
Slovenia | 4 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory | 4 (0%) |
Belarus | 4 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago | 4 (0%) |
Venezuela | 4 (0%) |
Cameroon | 3 (0%) |
Kuwait | 3 (0%) |
Jamaica | 3 (0%) |
Zambia | 3 (0%) |
Latvia | 3 (0%) |
Azerbaijan | 3 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of | 3 (0%) |
Cyprus | 3 (0%) |
Botswana | 3 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 3 (0%) |
Honduras | 3 (0%) |
Armenia | 3 (0%) |
Barbados | 2 (0%) |
Mongolia | 2 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic | 2 (0%) |
Asia-Pacific location | 2 (0%) |
Malta | 2 (0%) |
Sri Lanka | 2 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of | 2 (0%) |
Costa Rica | 2 (0%) |
Yemen | 2 (0%) |
Bahrain | 2 (0%) |
Eswatini | 2 (0%) |
Zimbabwe | 2 (0%) |
Nicaragua | 2 (0%) |
Estonia | 2 (0%) |
Guatemala | 1 (0%) |
Uganda | 1 (0%) |
Seychelles | 1 (0%) |
Macedonia | 1 (0%) |
Montenegro | 1 (0%) |
Unknown (Anonymous Proxy) | 1 (0%) |
Timor-Leste | 1 (0%) |
Faroe Islands | 1 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam | 1 (0%) |
Panama | 1 (0%) |
Maldives | 1 (0%) |
Libya | 1 (0%) |
Lesotho | 1 (0%) |
Haiti | 1 (0%) |
Afghanistan | 1 (0%) |
Mali | 1 (0%) |
Bolivia | 1 (0%) |
Gabon | 1 (0%) |