An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies

Marginean, Felicia; Arvidsson, Ida; Simoulis, Athanasios; Christian Overgaard, Niels, et al. (2021). An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies. European Urology Focus, 7, (5), 995 - 1001
Download:
DOI:
| Published | English
Authors:
Marginean, Felicia ; Arvidsson, Ida ; Simoulis, Athanasios ; Christian Overgaard, Niels , et al.
Department:
LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre
Urological cancer, Malmö
eSSENCE: The e-Science Collaboration
Mathematics (Faculty of Engineering)
ELLIIT: the Linköping-Lund initiative on IT and mobile communication
Mathematical Imaging Group
EpiHealth: Epidemiology for Health
Research Group:
Urological cancer, Malmö
Mathematical Imaging Group
Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Gleason grading is the standard diagnostic method for prostate cancer and is essential for determining prognosis and treatment. The dearth of expert pathologists, the inter- and intraobserver variability, as well as the labour intensity of Gleason grading all necessitate the development of a user-friendly tool for robust standardisation.

OBJECTIVE: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm, based on machine learning and convolutional neural networks, as a tool for improved standardisation in Gleason grading in prostate cancer biopsies.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 698 prostate biopsy sections from 174 patients were used for training. The training sections were annotated by two senior consultant pathologists. The final algorithm was tested on 37 biopsy sections from 21 patients, with digitised slide images from two different scanners.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Correlation, sensitivity, and specificity parameters were calculated.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The algorithm shows high accuracy in detecting cancer areas (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 68%). Compared with the pathologists, the algorithm also performed well in detecting cancer areas (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.99) and assigning the Gleason patterns correctly: Gleason patterns 3 and 4 (ICC: 0.96 and 0.94, respectively), and to a lesser extent, Gleason pattern 5 (ICC: 0.82). Similar results were obtained using two different scanners.

CONCLUSIONS: Our AI-based algorithm can reliably detect prostate cancer and quantify the Gleason patterns in core needle biopsies, with similar accuracy as pathologists. The results are reproducible on images from different scanners with a proven low level of intraobserver variability. We believe that this AI tool could be regarded as an efficient and interactive tool for pathologists.

PATIENT SUMMARY: We developed a sensitive artificial intelligence tool for prostate biopsies, which detects and grades cancer with similar accuracy to pathologists. This tool holds promise to improve the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Keywords:
Urology and Nephrology ; Medical Laboratory and Measurements Technologies
ISSN:
2405-4569
LUP-ID:
1535e8a4-5f5f-4c31-9f82-d42acb570f23 | Link: https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1535e8a4-5f5f-4c31-9f82-d42acb570f23 | Statistics

Cite this