Generalization of prostate cancer classification for multiple sites using deep learning

Arvidsson, Ida; Overgaard, Niels Christian; Marginean, Felicia Elena; Krzyzanowska, Agnieszka, et al. (2018-05-23). Generalization of prostate cancer classification for multiple sites using deep learning 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, ISBI 2018, 2018-April,, 191 - 194. 15th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, ISBI 2018. Washington, United States: IEEE Computer Society
Download:
DOI:
Conference Proceeding/Paper | Published | English
Authors:
Arvidsson, Ida ; Overgaard, Niels Christian ; Marginean, Felicia Elena ; Krzyzanowska, Agnieszka , et al.
Department:
eSSENCE: The e-Science Collaboration
ELLIIT: the Linköping-Lund initiative on IT and mobile communication
Mathematics (Faculty of Engineering)
Urological cancer, Malmö
Department of Translational Medicine
BioCARE: Biomarkers in Cancer Medicine improving Health Care, Education and Innovation
EpiHealth: Epidemiology for Health
Project:
Lund University AI Research
Digital Optimisation of Gleason Scoring (DOGS)
Research Group:
Urological cancer, Malmö
Abstract:

Deep learning has the potential to drastically increase the accuracy and efficiency of prostate cancer diagnosis, which would be of uttermost use. Today the diagnosis is determined manually from H&E stained specimens using a light microscope. In this paper several different approaches based on convolutional neural networks for prostate cancer classification are presented and compared, using three different datasets with different origins. The issue that algorithms trained on a certain site might not generalize to other sites, due to for example inevitable stain variations, is highlighted. Two different techniques to overcome this complication are compared; by training the networks using color augmentation and by using digital stain separation. Furthermore, the potential of using an autoencoder to get a more efficient downsampling is investigated, which turned out to be the method giving the best generalization. We achieve accuracies of 95% for classification of benign versus malignant tissue and 81% for Gleason grading for data from the same site as the training data. The corresponding accuracies for images from other sites are in average 88% and 52% respectively.

Keywords:
Autoencoder ; Convolutional neural network ; Digital stain separation ; Gleason grade ; Prostate cancer
ISBN:
9781538636367
LUP-ID:
3794a793-341a-4efe-adc1-e19d9d3130a6 | Link: https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/3794a793-341a-4efe-adc1-e19d9d3130a6 | Statistics

Cite this