Adaptive Interference Cancellation Using Common-Mode Information in DSL
(2005) 13th European Signal Processing Conference EUSIPCO, 2005- Abstract
- Exploiting the common-mode (CM) receive signal in wireline communication can yield significant improvements in terms of channel capacity compared to using only the differential-mode (DM) signal. Recently published, independent, scientific work proposed the employment of an adaptive CM-reference based interference canceller
and reported performance improvements based on simulation
results. Adaptive processing of correlated receive signals, however, bears the potential danger of cancelling the useful component—an undesired effect we will address. We present an analysis of the linear adaptive cancellation approach in this application. For a large class of practically relevant cases, it can be shown that a canceller, whose... (More) - Exploiting the common-mode (CM) receive signal in wireline communication can yield significant improvements in terms of channel capacity compared to using only the differential-mode (DM) signal. Recently published, independent, scientific work proposed the employment of an adaptive CM-reference based interference canceller
and reported performance improvements based on simulation
results. Adaptive processing of correlated receive signals, however, bears the potential danger of cancelling the useful component—an undesired effect we will address. We present an analysis of the linear adaptive cancellation approach in this application. For a large class of practically relevant cases, it can be shown that a canceller, whose coefficients are adapted while the far-end transmitter is silent, yields a signal-tonoise-and-interference power ratio (SNIR) which is higher than the SNIR of the DM-only channel output. Moreover, the performance of a canceller with this tap-setting is close to the performance of the front-end that is optimum in the sense of maximising the SNIR at its
output. Adaptation while the useful far-end signal is present yields a front-end whose output SNIR is considerably lower compared to the SNIR of the DM channel output. The results and their practical impact are demonstrated by an example. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/603369
- author
- Magesacher, Thomas LU ; Ödling, Per LU and Börjesson, Per Ola LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2005
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- host publication
- Proc. European Signal Processing Conference 2005
- conference name
- 13th European Signal Processing Conference EUSIPCO, 2005
- conference location
- Antalya, Turkey
- conference dates
- 2005-09-04 - 2005-09-08
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:84863702215
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- def1c024-0cfb-4d2e-a741-fb45cb63aa71 (old id 603369)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 13:42:49
- date last changed
- 2022-04-24 03:32:03
@inproceedings{def1c024-0cfb-4d2e-a741-fb45cb63aa71, abstract = {{Exploiting the common-mode (CM) receive signal in wireline communication can yield significant improvements in terms of channel capacity compared to using only the differential-mode (DM) signal. Recently published, independent, scientific work proposed the employment of an adaptive CM-reference based interference canceller<br/><br> and reported performance improvements based on simulation<br/><br> results. Adaptive processing of correlated receive signals, however, bears the potential danger of cancelling the useful component—an undesired effect we will address. We present an analysis of the linear adaptive cancellation approach in this application. For a large class of practically relevant cases, it can be shown that a canceller, whose coefficients are adapted while the far-end transmitter is silent, yields a signal-tonoise-and-interference power ratio (SNIR) which is higher than the SNIR of the DM-only channel output. Moreover, the performance of a canceller with this tap-setting is close to the performance of the front-end that is optimum in the sense of maximising the SNIR at its<br/><br> output. Adaptation while the useful far-end signal is present yields a front-end whose output SNIR is considerably lower compared to the SNIR of the DM channel output. The results and their practical impact are demonstrated by an example.}}, author = {{Magesacher, Thomas and Ödling, Per and Börjesson, Per Ola}}, booktitle = {{Proc. European Signal Processing Conference 2005}}, language = {{eng}}, title = {{Adaptive Interference Cancellation Using Common-Mode Information in DSL}}, url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/6187175/694082}}, year = {{2005}}, }