LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- GIS as a tool for environmental impact assessment : a case study of EIA implementation for the road building project in Strömstad, Sweden
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 1999
- Author/s
- Moskvitina, Marianna
- Department/s
- Dept of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science
- In LUP since
- 2007-11-01
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 1026 | 96 | 1 |
China ![]() |
100 (10%) |
United States of America ![]() |
98 (10%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ![]() |
65 (6%) |
Sweden ![]() |
64 (6%) |
India ![]() |
64 (6%) |
Nigeria ![]() |
63 (6%) |
Germany ![]() |
53 (5%) |
Bolivia ![]() |
32 (3%) |
Canada ![]() |
24 (2%) |
South Africa ![]() |
23 (2%) |
Unknown ![]() |
21 (2%) |
Brazil ![]() |
16 (2%) |
Pakistan ![]() |
16 (2%) |
Russian Federation ![]() |
15 (1%) |
Philippines ![]() |
14 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China) ![]() |
13 (1%) |
Trinidad and Tobago ![]() |
13 (1%) |
Malaysia ![]() |
12 (1%) |
Ethiopia ![]() |
12 (1%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Zimbabwe ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Kenya ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Indonesia ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Egypt ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Finland ![]() |
8 (1%) |
Ghana ![]() |
8 (1%) |
Bangladesh ![]() |
8 (1%) |
France ![]() |
8 (1%) |
Czechia ![]() |
7 (1%) |
Iran ![]() |
7 (1%) |
Spain ![]() |
7 (1%) |
Singapore ![]() |
7 (1%) |
Sri Lanka ![]() |
7 (1%) |
Ireland ![]() |
7 (1%) |
Uganda ![]() |
7 (1%) |
Saudi Arabia ![]() |
6 (1%) |
Australia ![]() |
6 (1%) |
Ecuador ![]() |
6 (1%) |
South Korea ![]() |
6 (1%) |
Cameroon ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Colombia ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Morocco ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Zambia ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Viet Nam ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Cyprus ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Argentina ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Poland ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Italy ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Myanmar ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Nepal ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Botswana ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Austria ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Turkiye ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Oman ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Japan ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Cambodia ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Switzerland ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Belgium ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Ukraine ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Thailand ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Portugal ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Romania ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Algeria ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Estonia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Mauritius ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Kazakhstan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Liberia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Denmark ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Greece ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Rwanda ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Mexico ![]() |
2 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Iceland ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Afghanistan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Norway ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Burkina Faso ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Dominican Republic ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Croatia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Taiwan (China) ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Niger ![]() |
1 (0%) |
European Union location ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Tunisia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Uzbekistan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
South Sudan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Iraq ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Sudan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Sierra Leone ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Mongolia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Serbia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Luxembourg ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Latvia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Slovakia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Chile ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Peru ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Georgia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Bhutan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Somalia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Malawi ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Papua New Guinea ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Bulgaria ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Fiji ![]() |
1 (0%) |
New Zealand ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Gabon ![]() |
1 (0%) |











































































































