LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- The Role of Negative eWOM in a High Involvement Decision Context
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2009
- Author/s
- Eicher, Brad; Beesapu, Shiva Bhaskary; Roeleveld, Michel
- Department/s
- Department of Business Administration
- In LUP since
- 2009-06-02
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 1571 | 192 | 14 |
Germany ![]() |
193 (12%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ![]() |
183 (12%) |
United States of America ![]() |
161 (10%) |
China ![]() |
112 (7%) |
Sweden ![]() |
86 (5%) |
Indonesia ![]() |
52 (3%) |
Malaysia ![]() |
45 (3%) |
India ![]() |
40 (3%) |
France ![]() |
38 (2%) |
Russian Federation ![]() |
36 (2%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ![]() |
35 (2%) |
Lithuania ![]() |
31 (2%) |
South Africa ![]() |
29 (2%) |
Hong Kong (China) ![]() |
29 (2%) |
Taiwan (China) ![]() |
28 (2%) |
Viet Nam ![]() |
27 (2%) |
Turkiye ![]() |
27 (2%) |
Norway ![]() |
26 (2%) |
Singapore ![]() |
23 (1%) |
Brazil ![]() |
19 (1%) |
Spain ![]() |
17 (1%) |
Hungary ![]() |
16 (1%) |
Canada ![]() |
16 (1%) |
Thailand ![]() |
14 (1%) |
Pakistan ![]() |
13 (1%) |
Iran ![]() |
13 (1%) |
Japan ![]() |
12 (1%) |
Ireland ![]() |
12 (1%) |
Finland ![]() |
11 (1%) |
South Korea ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Egypt ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Australia ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Czechia ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Philippines ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Italy ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Tunisia ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Romania ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Ukraine ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Greece ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Lebanon ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Sri Lanka ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Austria ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Belgium ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Portugal ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Latvia ![]() |
4 (0%) |
New Zealand ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Jordan ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Kenya ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Algeria ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Iraq ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Peru ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Nepal ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Switzerland ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Azerbaijan ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Nigeria ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Israel ![]() |
3 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Malta ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Argentina ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Macao ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Denmark ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Morocco ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Colombia ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Slovakia ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Mauritius ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Unknown ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Kazakhstan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Bolivia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Poland ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Bahrain ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Slovenia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Chile ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Venezuela ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Serbia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Cambodia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Reunion ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Oman ![]() |
1 (0%) |
European Union location ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Uruguay ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Bangladesh ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Bulgaria ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Mexico ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Kuwait ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Luxembourg ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Puerto Rico ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Barbados ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Zimbabwe ![]() |
1 (0%) |




























































































