LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Agenda Setting in the OECD - NGOs influence on OECD's Development Agenda
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2010
- Author/s
- Panahirad, Ashkan
- Department/s
- Master of Science in Global Studies
- In LUP since
- 2010-06-29
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 1442 | 148 | 4 |
United States of America ![]() |
242 (17%) |
Sweden ![]() |
195 (14%) |
Germany ![]() |
158 (11%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ![]() |
92 (6%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ![]() |
54 (4%) |
France ![]() |
52 (4%) |
Australia ![]() |
40 (3%) |
China ![]() |
36 (2%) |
Indonesia ![]() |
27 (2%) |
Canada ![]() |
25 (2%) |
South Africa ![]() |
25 (2%) |
Spain ![]() |
21 (1%) |
Japan ![]() |
20 (1%) |
South Korea ![]() |
20 (1%) |
Unknown ![]() |
19 (1%) |
Kenya ![]() |
18 (1%) |
Philippines ![]() |
16 (1%) |
Malaysia ![]() |
14 (1%) |
Turkiye ![]() |
14 (1%) |
Belgium ![]() |
12 (1%) |
Jamaica ![]() |
12 (1%) |
Austria ![]() |
12 (1%) |
India ![]() |
12 (1%) |
Singapore ![]() |
11 (1%) |
New Zealand ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Czechia ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Finland ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Taiwan (China) ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Zimbabwe ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Brazil ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Denmark ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Portugal ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Switzerland ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Ethiopia ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Italy ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Ghana ![]() |
8 (1%) |
Russian Federation ![]() |
8 (1%) |
Zambia ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Thailand ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Hong Kong (China) ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Nigeria ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Uganda ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Pakistan ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Viet Nam ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Argentina ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Colombia ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Ireland ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Algeria ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Hungary ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Mexico ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Greece ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Iran ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Armenia ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Malta ![]() |
4 (0%) |
European Union location ![]() |
3 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Peru ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Romania ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Slovakia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Azerbaijan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Egypt ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Albania ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Cameroon ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Uzbekistan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Saint Lucia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Poland ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Norway ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Tunisia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Lithuania ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Nepal ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Sierra Leone ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Myanmar ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Bangladesh ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Jordan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Botswana ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Kazakhstan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Ukraine ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Mozambique ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Belarus ![]() |
1 (0%) |
El Salvador ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Sudan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Cayman Islands ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Luxembourg ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Estonia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Bulgaria ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Guyana ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Iraq ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Slovenia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Curacao ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Latvia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Georgia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Uruguay ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory ![]() |
1 (0%) |
































































































