LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- How effective are language trainings for immigrants? Evaluating active labor market policies by applying propensity score matching
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2011
- Author/s
- Hanemann, Felizia
- Department/s
- Department of Economics
- In LUP since
- 2011-09-27
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 1182 | 59 | 4 |
Germany ![]() |
159 (13%) |
United States of America ![]() |
120 (10%) |
China ![]() |
105 (9%) |
Ethiopia ![]() |
103 (9%) |
Sweden ![]() |
69 (6%) |
Ghana ![]() |
40 (3%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ![]() |
40 (3%) |
France ![]() |
39 (3%) |
Indonesia ![]() |
37 (3%) |
Denmark ![]() |
29 (2%) |
South Africa ![]() |
22 (2%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ![]() |
19 (2%) |
Kenya ![]() |
19 (2%) |
Morocco ![]() |
18 (2%) |
Norway ![]() |
18 (2%) |
Nigeria ![]() |
17 (1%) |
Belgium ![]() |
16 (1%) |
Turkiye ![]() |
16 (1%) |
India ![]() |
15 (1%) |
Ukraine ![]() |
14 (1%) |
Canada ![]() |
12 (1%) |
Unknown ![]() |
12 (1%) |
Iran ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Italy ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Brazil ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Portugal ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Viet Nam ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Austria ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Philippines ![]() |
9 (1%) |
Russian Federation ![]() |
8 (1%) |
Malaysia ![]() |
8 (1%) |
Japan ![]() |
8 (1%) |
Singapore ![]() |
7 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China) ![]() |
7 (1%) |
Saudi Arabia ![]() |
6 (1%) |
Bangladesh ![]() |
6 (1%) |
Pakistan ![]() |
6 (1%) |
Mexico ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Peru ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Zambia ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Benin ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Czechia ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Finland ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Uganda ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Thailand ![]() |
4 (0%) |
South Korea ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Poland ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Eritrea ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Spain ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Hungary ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Argentina ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Rwanda ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Ireland ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Zimbabwe ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Malawi ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Switzerland ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Romania ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Eswatini ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Taiwan (China) ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Cyprus ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Venezuela ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Ecuador ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Australia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Sudan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Armenia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Estonia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Slovenia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Mauritius ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Luxembourg ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Colombia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
European Union location ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Nicaragua ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Serbia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Togo ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Senegal ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Jordan ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Croatia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Latvia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Somalia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Nepal ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Greece ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Lithuania ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Macedonia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Sri Lanka ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Tunisia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Georgia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Åland Islands ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Namibia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Albania ![]() |
1 (0%) |






























































































