LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Evaluating a hydrological flood routing function for implementation into a hydrological energy model
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2012
- Author/s
- Pelin, Victor; Pålsson, Alexander
- Department/s
- Division of Water Resources Engineering
- In LUP since
- 2012-03-20
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 4009 | 54 | 0 |
United States of America  |
470 (12%) |
India  |
431 (11%) |
Germany  |
313 (8%) |
Iran  |
249 (6%) |
Sweden  |
212 (5%) |
Ethiopia  |
138 (3%) |
Canada  |
130 (3%) |
China  |
118 (3%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  |
109 (3%) |
South Korea  |
78 (2%) |
Brazil  |
78 (2%) |
Indonesia  |
77 (2%) |
Turkiye  |
71 (2%) |
Philippines  |
70 (2%) |
Unknown  |
64 (2%) |
Malaysia  |
63 (2%) |
Nigeria  |
62 (2%) |
Italy  |
60 (1%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)  |
54 (1%) |
Australia  |
53 (1%) |
France  |
48 (1%) |
Peru  |
47 (1%) |
Spain  |
45 (1%) |
South Africa  |
43 (1%) |
Taiwan (China)  |
39 (1%) |
Thailand  |
38 (1%) |
Norway  |
37 (1%) |
Switzerland  |
35 (1%) |
Japan  |
34 (1%) |
Viet Nam  |
33 (1%) |
Iraq  |
33 (1%) |
Pakistan  |
28 (1%) |
Mexico  |
25 (1%) |
Ukraine  |
25 (1%) |
Poland  |
24 (1%) |
Russian Federation  |
23 (1%) |
Colombia  |
21 (1%) |
Kenya  |
20 (0%) |
Romania  |
20 (0%) |
Algeria  |
20 (0%) |
Hong Kong (China)  |
19 (0%) |
Egypt  |
18 (0%) |
Czechia  |
17 (0%) |
Greece  |
16 (0%) |
Morocco  |
15 (0%) |
Denmark  |
15 (0%) |
Argentina  |
15 (0%) |
Bangladesh  |
15 (0%) |
Nepal  |
14 (0%) |
New Zealand  |
13 (0%) |
Chile  |
13 (0%) |
Belgium  |
13 (0%) |
Ecuador  |
13 (0%) |
Singapore  |
12 (0%) |
Ghana  |
11 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of  |
11 (0%) |
Sudan  |
9 (0%) |
Portugal  |
9 (0%) |
European Union location  |
9 (0%) |
Saudi Arabia  |
9 (0%) |
Myanmar  |
8 (0%) |
Syrian Arab Republic  |
8 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates  |
7 (0%) |
Albania  |
7 (0%) |
Austria  |
7 (0%) |
Israel  |
7 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina  |
6 (0%) |
Jordan  |
6 (0%) |
Bolivia  |
6 (0%) |
Madagascar  |
6 (0%) |
Ireland  |
6 (0%) |
Lithuania  |
5 (0%) |
Luxembourg  |
5 (0%) |
Zimbabwe  |
5 (0%) |
Croatia  |
4 (0%) |
Zambia  |
4 (0%) |
Senegal  |
4 (0%) |
Hungary  |
4 (0%) |
Benin  |
4 (0%) |
Cameroon  |
4 (0%) |
El Salvador  |
4 (0%) |
Serbia  |
4 (0%) |
Finland  |
4 (0%) |
Botswana  |
4 (0%) |
Uganda  |
4 (0%) |
Panama  |
3 (0%) |
Uruguay  |
3 (0%) |
Slovakia  |
3 (0%) |
Malawi  |
3 (0%) |
Unknown (Anonymous Proxy)  |
3 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago  |
3 (0%) |
Bulgaria  |
3 (0%) |
Lebanon  |
3 (0%) |
Puerto Rico  |
3 (0%) |
XK  |
2 (0%) |
Slovenia  |
2 (0%) |
Venezuela  |
2 (0%) |
Cyprus  |
2 (0%) |
Guam  |
2 (0%) |
Tunisia  |
2 (0%) |
Belarus  |
2 (0%) |
Lao People's Democratic Republic  |
2 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory  |
2 (0%) |
Eritrea  |
2 (0%) |
Sri Lanka  |
2 (0%) |
Georgia  |
2 (0%) |
Namibia  |
1 (0%) |
Lesotho  |
1 (0%) |
Jamaica  |
1 (0%) |
Libya  |
1 (0%) |
Rwanda  |
1 (0%) |
Qatar  |
1 (0%) |
Niger  |
1 (0%) |
Azerbaijan  |
1 (0%) |
Paraguay  |
1 (0%) |
Congo  |
1 (0%) |
Kuwait  |
1 (0%) |
Unknown (Satellite Provider)  |
1 (0%) |
Mauritius  |
1 (0%) |
Costa Rica  |
1 (0%) |
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)  |
1 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire  |
1 (0%) |
Macao  |
1 (0%) |
Macedonia  |
1 (0%) |
Dominica  |
1 (0%) |
Afghanistan  |
1 (0%) |
Cambodia  |
1 (0%) |