LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Features of Arabic-French code-switching in Morocco : a sociolinguistic case study on intra-sentential code-switching in Morocco
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2016
- Author/s
- Luomala, Juhan
- Department/s
- Arabic Studies; Master's Programme: Language and Linguistics
- In LUP since
- 2016-01-29
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 8301 | 840 | 108 |
Morocco ![]() |
3532 (43%) |
United States of America ![]() |
1526 (18%) |
Germany ![]() |
382 (5%) |
France ![]() |
222 (3%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ![]() |
216 (3%) |
Algeria ![]() |
203 (2%) |
Unknown ![]() |
191 (2%) |
Sweden ![]() |
179 (2%) |
China ![]() |
129 (2%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ![]() |
107 (1%) |
Italy ![]() |
97 (1%) |
Russian Federation ![]() |
82 (1%) |
Canada ![]() |
70 (1%) |
Ireland ![]() |
68 (1%) |
Spain ![]() |
58 (1%) |
South Africa ![]() |
58 (1%) |
Bulgaria ![]() |
55 (1%) |
Tunisia ![]() |
49 (1%) |
Poland ![]() |
45 (1%) |
Saudi Arabia ![]() |
39 (0%) |
India ![]() |
39 (0%) |
Brazil ![]() |
37 (0%) |
Hong Kong (China) ![]() |
35 (0%) |
Japan ![]() |
35 (0%) |
Ukraine ![]() |
32 (0%) |
Malaysia ![]() |
32 (0%) |
Nigeria ![]() |
32 (0%) |
Singapore ![]() |
31 (0%) |
Egypt ![]() |
30 (0%) |
Indonesia ![]() |
28 (0%) |
Jordan ![]() |
28 (0%) |
Czechia ![]() |
25 (0%) |
Finland ![]() |
22 (0%) |
Romania ![]() |
21 (0%) |
Turkiye ![]() |
21 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates ![]() |
21 (0%) |
Israel ![]() |
20 (0%) |
Belgium ![]() |
20 (0%) |
Lithuania ![]() |
18 (0%) |
Portugal ![]() |
17 (0%) |
Denmark ![]() |
17 (0%) |
Oman ![]() |
17 (0%) |
Thailand ![]() |
16 (0%) |
Philippines ![]() |
16 (0%) |
Australia ![]() |
15 (0%) |
Iran ![]() |
15 (0%) |
Pakistan ![]() |
15 (0%) |
Latvia ![]() |
14 (0%) |
Iraq ![]() |
14 (0%) |
Ethiopia ![]() |
13 (0%) |
Mauritania ![]() |
12 (0%) |
Viet Nam ![]() |
12 (0%) |
Austria ![]() |
12 (0%) |
Yemen ![]() |
12 (0%) |
Kenya ![]() |
12 (0%) |
Hungary ![]() |
11 (0%) |
South Korea ![]() |
11 (0%) |
Bangladesh ![]() |
10 (0%) |
Mexico ![]() |
10 (0%) |
Switzerland ![]() |
10 (0%) |
Burkina Faso ![]() |
9 (0%) |
Ghana ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Argentina ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Palestinian Territory ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Lebanon ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Greece ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Norway ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Kuwait ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Georgia ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Senegal ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Qatar ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Serbia ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Bahrain ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Bolivia ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Slovakia ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Cambodia ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Libya ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Taiwan (China) ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Myanmar ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Togo ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Kazakhstan ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Cameroon ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Uzbekistan ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Puerto Rico ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Mali ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Luxembourg ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Ecuador ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Sudan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Azerbaijan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Costa Rica ![]() |
2 (0%) |
European Union location ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Mauritius ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Brunei Darussalam ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Chile ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Venezuela ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Colombia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Malawi ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Martinique ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Macedonia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Djibouti ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Peru ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Croatia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Belize ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Gibraltar ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Seychelles ![]() |
1 (0%) |
New Zealand ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Bahamas ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Namibia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Lesotho ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Belarus ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Malta ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Sierra Leone ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Iceland ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Rwanda ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Dominican Republic ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Estonia ![]() |
1 (0%) |























































































































