LUP Statistics
Record
- Title
- Is BEPS Action 6 “Preventing Treaty abuse” compatible with the EU Law concept of abuse?
- Type
- Student Paper
- Publ. year
- 2016
- Author/s
- Juka, Amela
- Department/s
- Department of Business Law
- In LUP since
- 2016-06-15
Downloads
| Total | This Year | This Month |
| 1849 | 69 | 0 |
United States of America ![]() |
214 (12%) |
Germany ![]() |
143 (8%) |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ![]() |
136 (7%) |
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ![]() |
125 (7%) |
Sweden ![]() |
102 (6%) |
Russian Federation ![]() |
85 (5%) |
China ![]() |
81 (4%) |
India ![]() |
68 (4%) |
Italy ![]() |
65 (4%) |
France ![]() |
56 (3%) |
Brazil ![]() |
38 (2%) |
South Africa ![]() |
35 (2%) |
Portugal ![]() |
35 (2%) |
Switzerland ![]() |
30 (2%) |
Ukraine ![]() |
29 (2%) |
Indonesia ![]() |
29 (2%) |
Spain ![]() |
28 (2%) |
Viet Nam ![]() |
26 (1%) |
Belgium ![]() |
26 (1%) |
Austria ![]() |
24 (1%) |
Malta ![]() |
21 (1%) |
Poland ![]() |
21 (1%) |
Bulgaria ![]() |
19 (1%) |
Denmark ![]() |
19 (1%) |
Unknown ![]() |
16 (1%) |
Finland ![]() |
16 (1%) |
Serbia ![]() |
15 (1%) |
Greece ![]() |
14 (1%) |
Turkiye ![]() |
12 (1%) |
South Korea ![]() |
12 (1%) |
Japan ![]() |
12 (1%) |
Nigeria ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Australia ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Hong Kong (China) ![]() |
11 (1%) |
Malaysia ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Singapore ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Norway ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Mauritius ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Thailand ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Canada ![]() |
10 (1%) |
Jamaica ![]() |
8 (0%) |
Argentina ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Morocco ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Luxembourg ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Kenya ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Lithuania ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Cyprus ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Bangladesh ![]() |
7 (0%) |
Mexico ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Romania ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Slovakia ![]() |
6 (0%) |
New Zealand ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Peru ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Hungary ![]() |
6 (0%) |
Ireland ![]() |
6 (0%) |
United Arab Emirates ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Sri Lanka ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Latvia ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Bosnia and Herzegovina ![]() |
5 (0%) |
Cote d'Ivoire ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Taiwan (China) ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Tanzania, the United Republic of ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Czechia ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Iceland ![]() |
4 (0%) |
Pakistan ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Uruguay ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Albania ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Iran ![]() |
3 (0%) |
Uzbekistan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Barbados ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Azerbaijan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Moldova, The Republic of ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Chile ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Israel ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Oman ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Colombia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Iraq ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Croatia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Bolivia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Cambodia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Aruba ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Panama ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Kazakhstan ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Ethiopia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Belarus ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Macedonia ![]() |
2 (0%) |
Dominican Republic ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Malawi ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Trinidad and Tobago ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Slovenia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Ecuador ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Tunisia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Samoa ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Philippines ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Zimbabwe ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Isle of Man ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Ghana ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Curacao ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Uganda ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Mali ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Estonia ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Botswana ![]() |
1 (0%) |
Fiji ![]() |
1 (0%) |






































































































